- From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2013 11:45:47 +0100
- To: Somnath Chandra <schandra@deity.gov.in>
- CC: Dave Lewis <dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie>, slata@mit.gov.in, public-multilingualweb-lt-comments@w3.org
- Message-ID: <511385DB.5090503@w3.org>
(Just forwarding so that this reaches the list - Felix) Am 07.02.13 11:06, schrieb Somnath Chandra: > Hello Lewis, > Thanks a lot for your feedback. We have studied the NIF encoding > and Indian Languages requirements for Hierarchical Annotation need to > be incorporated in details in NIF. > > As defined in NIF Version > (http://nlp2rdf.org/nif-1-0#toc-part-of-speech-tags ) , Part of speech > tags should make use of Ontologies of Linguistic Annotations (OLiA) . > OLiA connects local annotation tag sets with a global reference > ontology. Therefore it allows to keep the specific part of speech tag > at a fine granularity, while at the same time having a coarse grained > reference model. > > OLiA defines OLiA Annotation Models for morphology, morphosyntax and > syntax for multilingual. > > However there are three Multilingual Annotation Models for > morphological, morphosyntactic and syntactic annotation for Indian > langauges i.e L-POSTS tagset Baskaran et al. (2008) , AnnCorra,Bharati > et al. (2006), IIIT tagset,IIT (2007). > > We are in process of defining a common POS tagset for Indic > languages , based on W3C Internationalization best practices. The > draft standard has been developed and is under process of testing and > evaluation. Once finalized, the above three POS tagsets would be > replaced by this national standard , which may be incorporated in NIF. > > We would definitely actively participate in developing the best > practices for use of ITS with external NIF models with the W3C team. > > With regards, > > Dr. Somnath Chandra > Scientist-E & Dy. Country Manager W3C India > Dept. of Electronics & Information Technology > Ministry of Communications & Information Technology > Govt. of India > Tel:+91-11-24364744,24301856 > Fax: +91-11-24363099 > e-mail :schandra@mit.gov.in > > On 02/04/13, *Dave Lewis *<dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie> wrote: >> >> Hi Somnath, >> I wanted to follow up on this comment also. Do you have any comments >> on our response, was it satisfactory? If we hear from you to the >> contrary we will assume you are satisfied and aim to close ISSUE-109 >> on the 11th February. >> >> Kind Regards, >> Dave >> >> On 28/01/2013 00:46, Dave Lewis wrote: >>> Hi Somnath, >>> I wanted to update you of the status of ISSUE-109, related to >>> disambiguation. >>> >>> We discussed this at the WG face to face meeting last week, see: >>> http://www.w3.org/2013/01/23-mlw-lt-minutes.html#item37. >>> >>> The consensus was that hierarchical annotation for disambiguation >>> was difficult to achieve technically. As you point out, ITS override >>> rule mean that any hierarchical annotation has to be supported >>> explicitly with special attributes. However, doing this in a generic >>> way is difficult as we may also need to support multiple different >>> annotations of the same text, and therefore map sub-annotations to >>> specific parent ones. >>> >>> You may have seen that there has been extensive discussion on >>> potentially merging the terminology and disambiguation data categories: >>> http://www.w3.org/2013/01/24-mlw-lt-minutes.html#item03 >>> and >>> https://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/track/issues/68 >>> >>> At the meeting we asked the experts involved is considering >>> technical solutions to this to also address your hierarchical >>> annotation requirement, but this yielded no usable technical solution. >>> >>> We therefore propose to reject this suggested change. >>> >>> We would however point out that the external NIF encoding (see >>> http://nlp2rdf.org/) would be better suited to capturing such >>> hierarchical annotations. We would welcome you input therefore in >>> formulating best practice for the use of ITS with external NIF models. >>> >>> Please let us know if you are satisfied with this response. >>> >>> I look forward to hearing from you. >>> Regards, >>> Dave Lewis >>> >>> >>> On 21/01/2013 15:02, Dave Lewis wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> To speed the resolution of the different issues in your original >>>> post I'll restricted ISSUE-84 to comments about the translate data >>>> category and raised two new issues: >>>> ISSUE-108: locNote ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian [Indic] languages >>>> ISSUE-109: disambiguation ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian [Indic] >>>> languages >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Dave >>>> >>>> On 18/01/2013 12:46, Dr. David Filip wrote: >>>>> Hi all, this comment is now associated with Issue-84 >>>>> Rgds >>>>> dF >>>>> >>>>> Dr. David Filip >>>>> ======================= >>>>> LRC | CNGL | LT-Web | CSIS >>>>> University of Limerick, Ireland >>>>> telephone: +353-6120-2781 >>>>> *cellphone: +353-86-0222-158* >>>>> facsimile: +353-6120-2734 >>>>> mailto: david.filip@ul.ie <mailto:david.filip@ul.ie> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 8:52 AM, Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org >>>>> <mailto:fsasaki@w3.org>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Forwarded on behalf of Somnath Chandra (by permission), with >>>>> CC to Somnath and Svaran Lata.The comments are not yet in >>>>> tracker. See also new comments (also not in tracker yet) on >>>>> the www-international list at >>>>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-international/2013JanMar/0065.html >>>>> >>>>> If you have input for replying to the comments, please provide >>>>> it on our comments list (but feel free to put others in CC to >>>>> speed up the process). >>>>> >>>>> Best, >>>>> >>>>> Felix >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -------- Original-Nachricht -------- >>>>> Betreff: Fwd: ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian languages >>>>> Datum: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 13:46:52 +0530 >>>>> Von: Somnath Chandra <schandra@deity.gov.in> >>>>> <mailto:schandra@deity.gov.in> >>>>> An: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org> <mailto:fsasaki@w3.org> >>>>> Kopie (CC): slata <slata@mit.gov.in> <mailto:slata@mit.gov.in> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Dear Dr. Felix Sasaki, >>>>> W3C India has compiled the Indic Languages requirements for >>>>> ITS 2.0. Kindly find enclosed the draft document developed for >>>>> the purpose. >>>>> Submitted for kind perusal. Please feel free to contact me for >>>>> any further clarifications / discussions. >>>>> With best regards, >>>>> Somnath , W3C India >>>>> Dr. Somnath Chandra >>>>> Joint Director and Dy. Country Manager , W3C India >>>>> Dept. of Electronics & Information Technology >>>>> Ministry of Communications & Information Technology >>>>> Govt. of India >>>>> Tel:+91-11-24364744,24301811 <tel:+91-11-24364744,24301811> >>>>> Fax: +91-11-24363099 <tel:%2B91-11-24363099> >>>>> e-mail :schandra@mit.gov.in <mailto:schandra@mit.gov.in> >>>>> -------- Original Message -------- >>>>> From: *Prashant Verma *<vermaprashant1@gmail.com> >>>>> <mailto:vermaprashant1@gmail.com> >>>>> Date: Jan 10, 2013 2:20:32 PM >>>>> Subject: ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian languages >>>>> To: schandra@mit.gov.in <mailto:schandra@mit.gov.in> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> >>>>> Prashant Verma I Sr. Software Engineer >>>>> W3C India >>>>> New Delhi >>>>> Cell : +91-8800521042 <tel:%2B91-8800521042> >>>>> Website : http://www.w3cindia.in <http://www.w3cindia.in/> >>>>> -- >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> > --
Received on Thursday, 7 February 2013 10:46:26 UTC