Thursday, 28 September 2006
Tuesday, 26 September 2006
- [I18N Core] Teleconference Minutes 2006-09-26
- [Fwd: Re: a request for comment from the i18n WG]
- RE: [Comment on ITS WD] xml:lang = language info, please
- RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Translatability
Friday, 22 September 2006
- RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Translatability
- RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Translatability
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] xml:lang = language info, please
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] xml:lang = language info, please
Thursday, 21 September 2006
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] xml:lang = language info, please
- RE: [Comment on ITS WD] xml:lang = language info, please
Wednesday, 20 September 2006
- Re: Language subtag erratum for HTML 4.01
- RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Translatability
- Language subtag erratum for HTML 4.01
- RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Richard's editorial comments on ITS
- RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Avoid xml:lang='he'
Tuesday, 19 September 2006
Monday, 18 September 2006
Sunday, 17 September 2006
Friday, 15 September 2006
- RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Avoid xml:lang='he'
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Avoid xml:lang='he'
- RE: bidi-override scope in CSS2 and CSS 2.1
- RE: bidi-override scope in CSS2 and CSS 2.1
Thursday, 14 September 2006
- RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Avoid xml:lang='he'
- RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Avoid xml:lang='he'
- RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Avoid xml:lang='he'
- RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Avoid xml:lang='he'
- RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Avoid xml:lang='he'
Wednesday, 13 September 2006
Tuesday, 12 September 2006
- RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Example 33
- RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Use of xml:lang
- RE: [Comment on ITS WD] RFC 3066bis
Monday, 11 September 2006
- RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Invert translate examples
- RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Make the application of legacy ruby clearer
- RE: [Comment on ITS WD] xml:lang = language info, please
- RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Make the application of legacy ruby clearer
- RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Avoid xml:lang='he'
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] RFC 3066bis
- [Fwd: a request for comment from the i18n WG]
- RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Invert translate examples
- RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Use of xml:lang
- RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Example 33
- RE: [Comment on ITS WD] RFC 3066bis
- RE: [Comment on ITS WD] Invert translate examples
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Too many places to look
- RE: bidi-override scope in CSS2 and CSS 2.1
Sunday, 10 September 2006
Monday, 11 September 2006
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] ITS markup must be integrated
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Example 14 dir
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Example 14 translate
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Spell out the attributes
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Example 19 xml:lang
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] xml:lang missing
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] xml:lang = language info, please
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Example 32 head
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] in the case of no selection
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] rubyText is an attribute
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Make the application of legacy ruby clearer
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Use Japanese in Example 31
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Example 31 lacks rp
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Default is ltr
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Refer to bidi article
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Some Hebrew quotation
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Avoid xml:lang='he'
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Is dir mandatory?
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Repetition
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] No implementation section
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Standardised wording
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Hard to know what this is about
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Allowing for xpath expressions to point to term definitions
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] termInfoRef should allow for id strings
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] termInfoRefPointer referant's data
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Pointing to terms
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Role of termInfo
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Marks terms and meanings
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Attribute used for locInfo
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Example 24
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Explanations for examples
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Examples 22 and 23
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Loc Info or Loc Note
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Use of elements
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Mention translation tools
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] 6.3 ed 1
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Invert translate examples
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Default translate value
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Inheritance of translation information
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Translatability
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Use of xml:lang
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Example 33
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] RFC 3066bis
- Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Language information dc overview
Friday, 8 September 2006
Monday, 4 September 2006
- Re: Conformance to Unicode 5.0: Troubles on the horizon?
- Re: Conformance to Unicode 5.0: Troubles on the horizon?
- Conformance to Unicode 5.0: Troubles on the horizon?
Monday, 7 August 2006
Friday, 4 August 2006
Friday, 28 July 2006
- RE: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: dc:language
- RE: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: 3066 or its successor
- RE: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: Why one lexicon per language?
- RE: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: Add lang="it"
Monday, 24 July 2006
Friday, 21 July 2006
Thursday, 20 July 2006
Wednesday, 19 July 2006
Wednesday, 12 July 2006
Tuesday, 11 July 2006
- [Comment on ITS WD] Is dir mandatory?
- [Comment on ITS WD] Example 31 lacks rp
- [Comment on ITS WD] No implementation section
- [Comment on ITS WD] Some Hebrew quotation
- RE: [Comment on ITS WD] RFC 3066bis
- [Comment on ITS WD] Default is ltr
- [Comment on ITS WD] Refer to bidi article
- RE: [Comment on ITS WD] RFC 3066bis
- [Comment on ITS WD] Example 30
- RE: [Comment on ITS WD] RFC 3066bis
- ITS review notes
- [Comment on ITS WD] xml:lang = language info, please
- [Comment on ITS WD] Example 19 xml:lang
- [Comment on ITS WD] Attributes missing?
- [Comment on ITS WD] ITS markup must be integrated
- [Comment on ITS WD] Avoid xml:lang='he'
- [Comment on ITS WD] Example 14 dir
- [Comment on ITS WD] Example 14 translate
- [Comment on ITS WD] Spell out the attributes
- [Comment on ITS WD] xml:lang missing
- [Comment on ITS WD] Too many places to look
- [Comment on ITS WD] Example 32 head
- [Comment on ITS WD] in the case of no selection
- [Comment on ITS WD] rubyText is an attribute
- [Comment on ITS WD] Make the application of legacy ruby clearer
- [Comment on ITS WD] Existing ruby markup
- [Comment on ITS WD] Use Japanese in Example 31
- [Comment on ITS WD] Repetition
- [Comment on ITS WD] Standardised wording
- [Comment on ITS WD] Hard to know what this is about
- [Comment on ITS WD] Allowing for xpath expressions to point to term definitions
- [Comment on ITS WD] termInfoRef should allow for id strings
- [Comment on ITS WD] termInfoRefPointer referant's data
- [Comment on ITS WD] Pointing to terms
- [Comment on ITS WD] Role of termInfo
- [Comment on ITS WD] Marks terms and meanings
- [Comment on ITS WD] Attribute used for locInfo
- [Comment on ITS WD] Example 24
- [Comment on ITS WD] Explanations for examples
- [Comment on ITS WD] Examples 22 and 23
- [Comment on ITS WD] Loc Info or Loc Note
- [Comment on ITS WD] Use of elements
- [Comment on ITS WD] Mention translation tools
- [Comment on ITS WD] 6.3 ed 1
- [Comment on ITS WD] Invert translate examples
- [Comment on ITS WD] Default translate value
- [Comment on ITS WD] Inheritance of translation information
- [Comment on ITS WD] Translatability
- [Comment on ITS WD] Use of xml:lang
- [Comment on ITS WD] Example 33
- [Comment on ITS WD] RFC 3066bis
- [Comment on ITS WD] Language information dc overview
- [I18N Core] Teleconference Minutes 2006-07-11
- RE: Remarks on i18n core comments on ITS