- From: Addison Phillips <addison@yahoo-inc.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 12:53:59 -0700
- To: <ishida@w3.org>, <www-i18n-comments@w3.org>, <public-i18n-core@w3.org>
Richard remarked: > We also strongly recommend that you add the phrase "or its > successor" after reference to RFC 3066bis or BCP 47, since > RFC3066bis is expected to become obsolete soon after it is > released (to make way for RFC 3066ter). If you reference BCP 47 there is no need to say "or its successor", since BCP 47 is always the most recent set of documents. I had previously suggested the formulation: "[BCP 47] which is currently represented by [RFC 3066bis]" If you reference draft-ietf-ltru-registry-14.txt (i.e. RFC 3066bis), then you'll want to use the successor formula. Addison Addison Phillips Internationalization Architect - Yahoo! Inc. Internationalization is an architecture. It is not a feature.
Received on Tuesday, 11 July 2006 19:54:14 UTC