- From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 11:41:45 +0900
- To: ishida@w3.org
- Cc: www-i18n-comments@w3.org, public-i18n-core@w3.org, public-i18n-its@w3.org
Hello i18n core, This is a reply on behalf of the i18n ITS working group. See also http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3464 for our discussion. Thank you very much for your comment. We agreed to implement it. Please have a look at http://www.w3.org/International/its/itstagset/itstagset.html#terminology-implementation . Please let us know within 2 weeks if you are satisfied. If we don't hear from you , we will assume this issue as closed. Regards, Felix ishida@w3.org wrote: > Comment from the i18n review of: > http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-its-20060518/ > > Comment 22 > At http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0606-its/ > Editorial/substantive: S > Owner: RI > > Location in reviewed document: > 6.4.2 > > Comment: > Please provide a mechanism to point to a term definition if it doesn't have an associated id? Eg. in a DL list, where the successive DT and DD elements contain terms and definitions without ids. Surely something like termInfoPath is needed. > > > Example 19 shows this scenario quite clearly. Terms are identified, but not linked to the definitions given in the example. > > > FS: You could point to term definitions with a termInfoPointer attribute: > > > <dl> > > > <dt>...</dt> > > > <dd>...<dd> > > > </dl> > > > possibly in a different document (see my reply to your comment 50 below): > > > <its:termRule selector="//dl" termInfoPointer="following-sibling::dd"/> > > > For consistency, I would propose to keep the naming scheme "xxxPointer", and not "termInfoPath". Also for consistency, where should be a global or local termInfo attribute (if the ITS group decides to accept this proposal). > > > >
Received on Monday, 11 September 2006 02:42:08 UTC