- From: Yves Savourel <ysavourel@translate.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 12:58:43 -0600
- To: "'Richard Ishida'" <ishida@w3.org>
- Cc: <www-i18n-comments@w3.org>, <public-i18n-core@w3.org>, <public-i18n-its@w3.org>
Hi Richard, all, The text "or its succesor" has been added. See: http://www.w3.org/International/its/itstagset/itstagset.html#langinfo-definition Please let us know within 2 weeks if you are satisfied. If we don't hear from you, we will assume this issue as closed. Thanks, -yves -----Original Message----- From: public-i18n-its-request@w3.org [mailto:public-i18n-its-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Richard Ishida Sent: Monday, September 11, 2006 11:54 AM To: 'Felix Sasaki' Cc: www-i18n-comments@w3.org; public-i18n-core@w3.org; public-i18n-its@w3.org Subject: RE: [Comment on ITS WD] RFC 3066bis Personal comment: This markup MUST use values that conform to [RFC 4646]. " should say *... or its successor* ! So I think we've addressed only half of the comment. RI ============ Richard Ishida Internationalization Lead W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) http://www.w3.org/People/Ishida/ http://www.w3.org/International/ http://people.w3.org/rishida/blog/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/ishida/ > -----Original Message----- > From: Felix Sasaki [mailto:fsasaki@w3.org] > Sent: 11 September 2006 01:43 > To: ishida@w3.org > Cc: www-i18n-comments@w3.org; public-i18n-core@w3.org; > public-i18n-its@w3.org > Subject: Re: [Comment on ITS WD] RFC 3066bis > > Hello i18n core, > > This is a reply on behalf of the i18n ITS working group. See also > http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3457 for our discussion > . > > Thank you very much for your comment. We agreed to implement it like > the reference at > http://www.w3.org/International/its/itstagset/itstagset.html#l > anginfo-implementation > . > > Please let us know within 2 weeks if you are satisfied. If we don't > hear from you , we will assume this issue as closed. > > Regards, > > Felix > ishida@w3.org wrote: > > Comment from the i18n review of: > > http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-its-20060518/ > > > > Comment 2 > > At http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0606-its/ > > Editorial/substantive: S > > Owner: RI > > > > Location in reviewed document: > > 6.7.1 > > > > Comment: > > We recommend that you say, BCP 47 instead of RFC 3066bis. > > > > > > We also strongly recommend that you add the phrase "or its > successor" after reference to RFC 3066bis or BCP 47, since RFC3066bis > is expected to become obsolete soon after it is released (to make way > for RFC 3066ter). > > > > > > > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 12 September 2006 18:59:32 UTC