RE: [Comment on ITS WD] xml:lang = language info, please

Personal comment:

"Applying the language information data category to xml:lang attributes
using global rules is not necessary, since xml:lang is already defined in
terms of [RFC 4646]."

Strictly speaking xml is defined in terms of RFC 3066 or its successor.  It
may be better to say "in terms of [BCP 47]" at this location.  If not, you
should add, or it's successor.  (Bear in mind that RFC 4646bis is just
around the corner, relatively speaking.)

RI


============
Richard Ishida
Internationalization Lead
W3C (World Wide Web Consortium)

http://www.w3.org/People/Ishida/
http://www.w3.org/International/
http://people.w3.org/rishida/blog/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ishida/
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Felix Sasaki [mailto:fsasaki@w3.org] 
> Sent: 11 September 2006 04:47
> To: ishida@w3.org
> Cc: www-i18n-comments@w3.org; public-i18n-core@w3.org; 
> public-i18n-its@w3.org
> Subject: Re: [Comment on ITS WD] xml:lang = language info, please
> 
> Hello i18n core,
> 
> This is a reply on behalf of the i18n ITS working group. See also
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3515 for our discussion.
> 
> Thank you very much for your comment. We agreed to implement 
> it. Please have a look at 
> http://www.w3.org/International/its/itstagset/itstagset.html#l
> anginfo-implementation
>  , the note below example 38.
> 
> 
> Please let us know within 2 weeks if you are satisfied. If we 
> don't hear  from you , we will assume this issue as closed.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Felix
> 
> 
> ishida@w3.org wrote:
> > Comment from the i18n review of:
> > http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-its-20060518/
> > 
> > Comment 48
> > At http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0606-its/
> > Editorial/substantive: E
> > Owner: RI
> > 
> > Location in reviewed document:
> > General
> > 
> > Comment:
> > We feel that there should be a note in the specification 
> that says that it is implied/understood that xml:lang 
> represents language information wherever it appears.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
>

Received on Monday, 11 September 2006 19:08:47 UTC