- From: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 09:54:23 +0100
- To: "'Felix Sasaki'" <fsasaki@w3.org>, <public-i18n-core@w3.org>
Most comments went into the table at http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0606-its/ Those that didn't can be seen below. ============ Richard Ishida Internationalization Lead W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) http://www.w3.org/People/Ishida/ http://www.w3.org/International/ http://people.w3.org/rishida/blog/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/ishida/ > -----Original Message----- > From: public-i18n-core-request@w3.org > [mailto:public-i18n-core-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Felix Sasaki ... > First a clarification question: Will there be more places of > comments than > > A) > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-i18n-comments/2006Jul/0000.html > B) > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-i18n-comments/2006Jul/0001.html > C) > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-core/2006JulSep/0008.html > D) > http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0606-its/ > > ? D) Contains editorial comments and substantive ones, and I > think it would be good to get *all* further comments only as > an addition to D), to make tracking easier. A-C contain numerous small editorial suggestions. I'm not expecting major discussions to result from them, they are mostly for consideration by the ITS editor. I don't expect the ITS group to track each one of these suggestions individually through the formal comment review tracking mechanism. D, on the other hand, contains more important editorial comments, that may need discussion within the group, or that I'd particularly like to see, plus some more substantive comments. I do expect the ITS group to respond to these one by one. ... > Comment 17, 18, 19, 20: These comments are on sec. 6.3.2, but > the review table says "6.2.3". Fixed.
Received on Tuesday, 11 July 2006 08:54:32 UTC