- From: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 20:02:40 +0100
- To: "'Felix Sasaki'" <fsasaki@w3.org>
- Cc: <www-i18n-comments@w3.org>, <public-i18n-core@w3.org>, <public-i18n-its@w3.org>
Personal response: You copied my text so verbatim that you kept the typo ;-) do no contain -> do not contain RI ============ Richard Ishida Internationalization Lead W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) http://www.w3.org/People/Ishida/ http://www.w3.org/International/ http://people.w3.org/rishida/blog/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/ishida/ > -----Original Message----- > From: Felix Sasaki [mailto:fsasaki@w3.org] > Sent: 11 September 2006 04:30 > To: ishida@w3.org > Cc: www-i18n-comments@w3.org; public-i18n-core@w3.org; > public-i18n-its@w3.org > Subject: Re: [Comment on ITS WD] Make the application of > legacy ruby clearer > > Hello i18n core, > > This is a reply on behalf of the i18n ITS working group. See also > http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3506 for our discussion. > > Thank you very much for your comment. We agreed to implement > it. Please have a look at > http://www.w3.org/International/its/itstagset/itstagset.html#r > uby-implementation > , especially example 36. > > > > Please let us know within 2 weeks if you are satisfied. If we > don't hear from you , we will assume this issue as closed. > > Regards, > > Felix > > > ishida@w3.org wrote: > > Comment from the i18n review of: > > http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-its-20060518/ > > > > Comment 36 > > At http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0606-its/ > > Editorial/substantive: E > > Owner: RI > > > > Location in reviewed document: > > 6.6.3 > > > > Comment: > > It is very poorly explained what the difference is between > this and the situation described in the last para of 6.6.2. > > > > > > How about: > > > > > > "Where legacy formats do no contain ruby markup conformant > to [Ruby-TR], it is still possible to associate ruby text > with a specified range of document content using the rubyRule > element." > > > > > > Note also s/and there one wants/and where one wants/ > > > > > > > > > >
Received on Monday, 11 September 2006 19:03:06 UTC