- From: <ishida@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 20:33:56 +0000
- To: www-i18n-comments@w3.org, public-i18n-core@w3.org
Comment from the i18n review of: http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-its-20060518/ Comment 36 At http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0606-its/ Editorial/substantive: E Owner: RI Location in reviewed document: 6.6.3 Comment: It is very poorly explained what the difference is between this and the situation described in the last para of 6.6.2. How about: "Where legacy formats do no contain ruby markup conformant to [Ruby-TR], it is still possible to associate ruby text with a specified range of document content using the rubyRule element." Note also s/and there one wants/and where one wants/
Received on Tuesday, 11 July 2006 19:34:06 UTC