- From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 12:37:17 +0900
- To: ishida@w3.org
- Cc: www-i18n-comments@w3.org, public-i18n-core@w3.org, public-i18n-its@w3.org
Hello i18n core, This is a reply on behalf of the i18n ITS working group. See also http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3507 for our discussion. Thank you very much for your comment. We agreed to implement it. Please have a look at http://www.w3.org/International/its/itstagset/itstagset.html#ruby-implementation . We have made another modification as a reply to your comment at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-i18n-comments/2006Jul/0026.html http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3496 on standardized wording. Please let us know within 2 weeks if you are satisfied. If we don't hear from you , we will assume this issue as closed. Regards, Felix ishida@w3.org wrote: > Comment from the i18n review of: > http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-its-20060518/ > > Comment 38 > At http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0606-its/ > Editorial/substantive: E > Owner: RI > > Location in reviewed document: > 6.6.3 > > Comment: > I don't understand the following two pieces of text: > > > "(corresponding to the rt element in the case of no selections)" > > > ", corresponding to the rb element in the case of no selection." > > > >
Received on Monday, 11 September 2006 03:37:37 UTC