- From: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 18:54:21 +0100
- To: "'Felix Sasaki'" <fsasaki@w3.org>
- Cc: <www-i18n-comments@w3.org>, <public-i18n-core@w3.org>, <public-i18n-its@w3.org>
Personal comment: This markup MUST use values that conform to [RFC 4646]. " should say *... or its successor* ! So I think we've addressed only half of the comment. RI ============ Richard Ishida Internationalization Lead W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) http://www.w3.org/People/Ishida/ http://www.w3.org/International/ http://people.w3.org/rishida/blog/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/ishida/ > -----Original Message----- > From: Felix Sasaki [mailto:fsasaki@w3.org] > Sent: 11 September 2006 01:43 > To: ishida@w3.org > Cc: www-i18n-comments@w3.org; public-i18n-core@w3.org; > public-i18n-its@w3.org > Subject: Re: [Comment on ITS WD] RFC 3066bis > > Hello i18n core, > > This is a reply on behalf of the i18n ITS working group. See also > http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3457 for our > discussion . > > Thank you very much for your comment. We agreed to implement > it like the reference at > http://www.w3.org/International/its/itstagset/itstagset.html#l > anginfo-implementation > . > > Please let us know within 2 weeks if you are satisfied. If we > don't hear from you , we will assume this issue as closed. > > Regards, > > Felix > ishida@w3.org wrote: > > Comment from the i18n review of: > > http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-its-20060518/ > > > > Comment 2 > > At http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0606-its/ > > Editorial/substantive: S > > Owner: RI > > > > Location in reviewed document: > > 6.7.1 > > > > Comment: > > We recommend that you say, BCP 47 instead of RFC 3066bis. > > > > > > We also strongly recommend that you add the phrase "or its > successor" after reference to RFC 3066bis or BCP 47, since > RFC3066bis is expected to become obsolete soon after it is > released (to make way for RFC 3066ter). > > > > > > > > > >
Received on Monday, 11 September 2006 17:54:37 UTC