public-hydra@w3.org from August 2014 by date

Sunday, 31 August 2014

• Re: validating Hydra documents (and ontologies) Dimitris Kontokostas

Friday, 29 August 2014

• Re: Using Hydra alongside other vocabularies Kev Kirkland

Thursday, 28 August 2014

• Using Hydra alongside other vocabularies Kev Kirkland

Friday, 29 August 2014

• Re: hydra:Collection with reverse property (in manages) Thomas Hoppe

Thursday, 28 August 2014

• Re: hydra:Collection with reverse property (in manages) ☮ elf Pavlik ☮
• AW: RE: Use of schema.org with hydra Dietrich Schulten

Tuesday, 26 August 2014

• RE: hydra:Collection with reverse property (in manages) Markus Lanthaler
• Re: hydra:Collection with reverse property (in manages) Luca Matteis
• hydra:Collection with reverse property (in manages) ☮ elf Pavlik ☮

Monday, 25 August 2014

• Re: Express "go to specific page" for a collection Chris Chapman
• Re: Core Vocabulary diagram might be confusing Chris Chapman
• RE: Core Vocabulary diagram might be confusing (ISSUE-24) Markus Lanthaler
• RE: Use of schema.org with hydra Markus Lanthaler
• Re: Core Vocabulary diagram might be confusing Ruben Verborgh
• Re: Core Vocabulary diagram might be confusing Jindřich Mynarz
• Re: Core Vocabulary diagram might be confusing Ruben Verborgh
• Re: Core Vocabulary diagram might be confusing Ruben Verborgh
• Re: Core Vocabulary diagram might be confusing Jindřich Mynarz
• RE: Core Vocabulary diagram might be confusing Markus Lanthaler
• Re: Core Vocabulary diagram might be confusing Andreas Kuckartz
• Core Vocabulary diagram might be confusing Ruben Verborgh

Sunday, 24 August 2014

• Use of schema.org with hydra Dietrich Schulten

Friday, 22 August 2014

• Re: Moving forward with ISSUE-30 (IRI template expansion) Kingsley Idehen
• Supported operations per hydra:Class instance Eric Brisco
• Re: Moving forward with ISSUE-30 (IRI template expansion) Ruben Verborgh
• Re: Moving forward with ISSUE-30 (IRI template expansion) Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Moving forward with ISSUE-30 (IRI template expansion) Ruben Verborgh
• Re: Moving forward with ISSUE-30 (IRI template expansion) Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Moving forward with ISSUE-30 (IRI template expansion) Kingsley Idehen

Thursday, 21 August 2014

• RE: Attempt in implementing a Hydra API Markus Lanthaler
• RE: hello and some feedback Markus Lanthaler

Wednesday, 20 August 2014

• RE: Moving forward with ISSUE-30 (IRI template expansion) Markus Lanthaler
• Re: Moving forward with ISSUE-30 (IRI template expansion) Ruben Verborgh
• RE: Moving forward with ISSUE-30 (IRI template expansion) Markus Lanthaler
• Re: Moving forward with ISSUE-30 (IRI template expansion) Ruben Verborgh
• RE: Moving forward with ISSUE-30 (IRI template expansion) Markus Lanthaler
• RE: Moving forward with ISSUE-30 (IRI template expansion) Markus Lanthaler
• RE: Moving forward with ISSUE-30 (IRI template expansion) McBennett, Pat
• Re: Moving forward with ISSUE-30 (IRI template expansion) Ruben Verborgh
• RE: Moving forward with ISSUE-30 (IRI template expansion) McBennett, Pat

Tuesday, 19 August 2014

• RE: Moving forward with ISSUE-30 (IRI template expansion) McBennett, Pat
• RE: Moving forward with ISSUE-30 (IRI template expansion) McBennett, Pat
• Meetup @ SemTechBiz Gregg Kellogg
• Re: Moving forward with ISSUE-30 (IRI template expansion) Gregg Kellogg
• Re: Moving forward with ISSUE-30 (IRI template expansion) Gregg Kellogg
• Re: Moving forward with ISSUE-30 (IRI template expansion) Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Moving forward with ISSUE-30 (IRI template expansion) Ruben Verborgh
• Re: hello and some feedback Martijn Faassen
• RE: Moving forward with ISSUE-30 (IRI template expansion) Markus Lanthaler
• RE: hello and some feedback Markus Lanthaler
• Re: Moving forward with ISSUE-30 (IRI template expansion) Ruben Verborgh
• RE: Moving forward with ISSUE-30 (IRI template expansion) Markus Lanthaler
• RE: Moving forward with ISSUE-30 (IRI template expansion) Markus Lanthaler
• Re: hello and some feedback Martijn Faassen
• Re: Moving forward with ISSUE-30 (IRI template expansion) Ruben Verborgh
• RE: Moving forward with ISSUE-30 (IRI template expansion) McBennett, Pat

Monday, 18 August 2014

• RE: hello and some feedback Markus Lanthaler
• hello and some feedback Martijn Faassen

Friday, 15 August 2014

• Re: Attempt in implementing a Hydra API Jindřich Mynarz
• RE: Moving forward with ISSUE-30 (IRI template expansion) Markus Lanthaler
• RE: Moving forward with ISSUE-30 (IRI template expansion) Markus Lanthaler
• RE: Attempt in implementing a Hydra API Markus Lanthaler
• FW: Moving forward with ISSUE-30 (IRI template expansion) McBennett, Pat
• Re: Attempt in implementing a Hydra API Jindřich Mynarz
• Re: Moving forward with ISSUE-30 (IRI template expansion) Ruben Verborgh
• Re: Attempt in implementing a Hydra API Ruben Verborgh
• Attempt in implementing a Hydra API Jindřich Mynarz

Thursday, 14 August 2014

• RE: Moving forward with ISSUE-30 (IRI template expansion) McBennett, Pat

Wednesday, 13 August 2014

• Re: Moving forward with ISSUE-30 (IRI template expansion) Ruben Verborgh
• RE: Moving forward with ISSUE-30 (IRI template expansion) Markus Lanthaler
• Re: Moving forward with ISSUE-30 (IRI template expansion) Ruben Verborgh

Tuesday, 12 August 2014

• Re: Moving forward with ISSUE-30 (IRI template expansion) Gregg Kellogg
• RE: Moving forward with ISSUE-30 (IRI template expansion) Markus Lanthaler
• RE: Moving forward with ISSUE-30 (IRI template expansion) McBennett, Pat
• Re: Moving forward with ISSUE-30 (IRI template expansion) Ruben Verborgh
• RE: Moving forward with ISSUE-30 (IRI template expansion) Markus Lanthaler

Monday, 11 August 2014

• Re: Moving forward with ISSUE-30 (IRI template expansion) Ruben Verborgh
• RE: Moving forward with ISSUE-30 (IRI template expansion) Markus Lanthaler

Sunday, 10 August 2014

• RE: Moving forward with ISSUE-30 (IRI template expansion) McBennett, Pat
• RE: Has ISSUE-66 been properly addressed? McBennett, Pat

Saturday, 9 August 2014

• Re: Has ISSUE-66 been properly addressed? David Booth
• Re: Has ISSUE-66 been properly addressed? Kingsley Idehen

Friday, 8 August 2014

• Re: Has ISSUE-66 been properly addressed? Erik Wilde
• Re: Has ISSUE-66 been properly addressed? Luca Matteis
• Re: Has ISSUE-66 been properly addressed? Luca Matteis
• RE: Has ISSUE-66 been properly addressed? McBennett, Pat
• Re: Moving forward with ISSUE-30 (IRI template expansion) Ruben Verborgh
• RE: "Plain JSON" vs Hydra Dimitri van Hees
• Re: ISSUE-66: LinkedDataT Kingsley Idehen
• RE: Moving forward with ISSUE-30 (IRI template expansion) Markus Lanthaler
• Has ISSUE-66 been properly addressed? Markus Lanthaler
• RE: "Plain JSON" vs Hydra Markus Lanthaler
• Re: ISSUE-66: LinkedDataT Kjetil Kjernsmo

Thursday, 7 August 2014

• Re: ISSUE-66: LinkedData™ Kingsley Idehen
• Re: ISSUE-66: LinkedDataT Kingsley Idehen
• Re: ISSUE-66: LinkedDataT Kingsley Idehen
• RE: ISSUE-66: LinkedData(tm) McBennett, Pat
• RE: validating Hydra documents (and ontologies) Dimitris Kontokostas
• RE: validating Hydra documents (and ontologies) Markus Lanthaler
• Re: validating Hydra documents (and ontologies) Dimitris Kontokostas
• Re: making the LDF spec accessible for a broader audience Kingsley Idehen
• Re: validating Hydra documents (and ontologies) Luca Matteis
• RE: validating Hydra documents (and ontologies) Markus Lanthaler
• Re: validating Hydra documents (and ontologies) Andreas Kuckartz
• validating Hydra documents (and ontologies) Ruben Verborgh

Wednesday, 6 August 2014

• RE: ISSUE-66: LinkedDataT Markus Lanthaler
• Re: ISSUE-66: LinkedData™ John Walker
• Re: ISSUE-66: LinkedData™ John Walker
• Re: ISSUE-66: LinkedDataT David Booth
• Re: ISSUE-66: LinkedDataT Ruben Verborgh
• Re: ISSUE-66: LinkedDataT Gregg Kellogg
• Re: ISSUE-66: LinkedDataT Ruben Verborgh
• RE: "Plain JSON" vs Hydra Dimitri van Hees
• RE: "Plain JSON" vs Hydra Dimitri van Hees
• RE: ISSUE-66: LinkedDataT Markus Lanthaler
• Re: making the LDF spec accessible for a broader audience Ruben Verborgh
• Re: ISSUE-66: LinkedDataT Ruben Verborgh
• Re: ISSUE-66: LinkedDataT Kingsley Idehen
• Re: ISSUE-66: LinkedDataT Kingsley Idehen
• Re: ISSUE-66: LinkedDataT Ícaro Medeiros
• Re: ISSUE-66: LinkedDataT John Walker
• Re: ISSUE-66: LinkedDataT Kingsley Idehen
• Re: ISSUE-66: LinkedDataT Kingsley Idehen

Tuesday, 5 August 2014

• Re: ISSUE-66: LinkedDataT David Booth
• Re: ISSUE-66: LinkedData™ David Booth
• Re: ISSUE-66: LinkedDataT Kingsley Idehen
• Re: ISSUE-66: LinkedDataT Kingsley Idehen
• Re: ISSUE-66: LinkedDataT Kingsley Idehen
• Re: ISSUE-66: LinkedData™ Kingsley Idehen
• Re: ISSUE-66: LinkedData™ Kingsley Idehen
• RE: "Plain JSON" vs Hydra Markus Lanthaler
• Re: ISSUE-66: LinkedData™ Kingsley Idehen
• RE: ISSUE-66: LinkedDataT Markus Lanthaler
• Re: ISSUE-66: LinkedData™ Kingsley Idehen
• RE: ISSUE-66: LinkedDataT Markus Lanthaler
• Re: "Plain JSON" vs Hydra John Walker
• Re: ISSUE-66: LinkedData™ Kingsley Idehen
• RE: "Plain JSON" vs Hydra Markus Lanthaler
• Re: ISSUE-66: LinkedData™ David Booth
• RE: "Plain JSON" vs Hydra Markus Lanthaler
• Re: ISSUE-66: LinkedData™ John Walker
• RE: "Plain JSON" vs Hydra Dimitri van Hees
• Re: ISSUE-66: LinkedDataT David Booth
• Re: ISSUE-66: LinkedDataT David Booth
• Re: ISSUE-66: LinkedData™ David Booth
• Re: "Plain JSON" vs Hydra Ruben Verborgh
• Re: ISSUE-66: LinkedDataT Ruben Verborgh
• RE: "Plain JSON" vs Hydra Dimitri van Hees
• Re: ISSUE-66: LinkedDataT Erik Wilde
• RE: "Plain JSON" vs Hydra Dimitri van Hees
• Re: "Plain JSON" vs Hydra Benjamin Cogrel
• Re: "Plain JSON" vs Hydra John Walker
• Re: ISSUE-66: LinkedDataT Ruben Verborgh
• Re: "Plain JSON" vs Hydra Ruben Verborgh
• "Plain JSON" vs Hydra Dimitri van Hees
• Re: ISSUE-66: LinkedDataT Ruben Verborgh
• Re: ISSUE-66: LinkedDataT John Walker
• Re: ISSUE-66: LinkedData™ Ruben Verborgh
• Re: ISSUE-66: LinkedData™ John Walker
• Re: ISSUE-66: LinkedDataT Alfredo Serafini
• RE: ISSUE-66: LinkedDataT Markus Lanthaler
• Re: ISSUE-66: LinkedDataT Ruben Verborgh
• RE: ISSUE-66: LinkedDataT Markus Lanthaler
• Re: visualizer for Linked Data Fragments Andreas Kuckartz
• Re: visualizer for Linked Data Fragments Alfredo Serafini
• Re: ISSUE-66: LinkedData™ Andreas Kuckartz
• Re: visualizer for Linked Data Fragments Ruben Verborgh
• Re: visualizer for Linked Data Fragments Pieter Colpaert
• Re: ISSUE-66: LinkedData™ Ruben Verborgh

Monday, 4 August 2014

• Re: ISSUE-66: LinkedData™ David Booth
• Re: ISSUE-66: LinkedData™ Erik Wilde
• Re: ISSUE-66: LinkedData™ David Booth
• ISSUE-66: LinkedData™ Erik Wilde
• Re: visualizer for Linked Data Fragments Alfredo Serafini
• RE: Proposed resolution for ISSUE-64 (status codes) Markus Lanthaler
• Re: visualizer for Linked Data Fragments Ruben Verborgh
• RE: 404 Re: Comments on the Triple Patterns Fragments draft Markus Lanthaler
• RE: 404 Re: Comments on the Triple Patterns Fragments draft Markus Lanthaler
• Re: making the LDF spec accessible for a broader audience Alfredo Serafini
• making the LDF spec accessible for a broader audience Ruben Verborgh
• Re: 404 Re: Comments on the Triple Patterns Fragments draft Ruben Verborgh

Sunday, 3 August 2014

• Re: 404 Re: Comments on the Triple Patterns Fragments draft Ruben Verborgh
• Re: 404 Re: Comments on the Triple Patterns Fragments draft Peter Vandenabeele

Saturday, 2 August 2014

• RE: Proposed resolution for ISSUE-64 (status codes) McBennett, Pat
• Re: Proposed resolution for ISSUE-64 (status codes) Ruben Verborgh

Friday, 1 August 2014

• Re: Proposed resolution for ISSUE-64 (status codes) Kuno Woudt
• Re: Proposed resolution for ISSUE-64 (status codes) David Booth
• Re: Proposed resolution for ISSUE-64 (status codes) Ruben Verborgh
• Re: Proposed resolution for ISSUE-64 (status codes) David Booth
• Re: 404 Re: Comments on the Triple Patterns Fragments draft Ruben Verborgh
• Re: 404 Re: Comments on the Triple Patterns Fragments draft Ruben Verborgh
• Re: 404 Re: Comments on the Triple Patterns Fragments draft Kjetil Kjernsmo
• RE: Proposed resolution for ISSUE-64 (status codes) Markus Lanthaler
• RE: Introduction and a question about JSON-LD Markus Lanthaler
• Re: 404 Re: Comments on the Triple Patterns Fragments draft Ruben Verborgh
• Re: Proposed resolution for ISSUE-64 (status codes) Ruben Verborgh
• RE: Proposed resolution for ISSUE-64 (status codes) Markus Lanthaler
• Re: 404 Re: Comments on the Triple Patterns Fragments draft David Booth
• Re: 404 Re: Comments on the Triple Patterns Fragments draft Olaf Hartig

Last message date: Sunday, 31 August 2014 21:11:36 UTC