Re: Moving forward with ISSUE-30 (IRI template expansion)

>> Markus, you said elsewhere that we don't have the goal of describing
>> *any* API, i.e., that APIs sometimes have to follow what Hydra
>> prescribes. The above seems to conflict with that. Any insights into
>> this?
> 
> I don't follow. Why does this conflict with that statement? Actually, I
> can't see any connection between these statements.

Sorry man, misread! I thought your

>>> Yes, that's at least what I want :-) 

was your reply to 

>>>> Personally I preferred the broader interpretation that this mechanism

>>>> could do 'anything' with 'any part' of the template URI

while it was really a reply to

>>>> Am I correct that we really wish to limit this to purely variable substitution?


So err… fully agree, yeah. Let's limit.

Ruben

Received on Wednesday, 13 August 2014 11:56:31 UTC