- From: Erik Wilde <dret@berkeley.edu>
- Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2014 14:35:35 -0700
- To: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>, public-hydra@w3.org
hello.
On 2014-08-04, 14:11 , David Booth wrote:
> Yes, because that's what it is. This question was discussed to death a
> while back, and finally laid to rest by the official publication of the
> W3C Linked Data Glossary:
> http://www.w3.org/TR/ld-glossary/#linked-data
> In this community, use of the term "linked data" to mean anything other
> than RDF will create unnecessary confusion and be a disservice to the
> community.
i was specifically trying not to get that discussion going. just asking
whether there should be some definition/clarification of the term, just
to let readers know what it means in the context of the spec/community.
if you define a broad term to mean a narrow thing, then this might be
helpful to avoid possible confusion.
cheers,
dret.
--
erik wilde | mailto:dret@berkeley.edu - tel:+1-510-2061079 |
| UC Berkeley - School of Information (ISchool) |
| http://dret.net/netdret http://twitter.com/dret |
Received on Monday, 4 August 2014 21:36:01 UTC