- From: Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be>
- Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 12:32:52 +0200
- To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Cc: public-hydra@w3.org
> You need them because denoting reference style identifiers using angle brackets is an existing pattern in broad use. Isn't that pragmatic enough? Good, but then I come back to my earlier point: it's either angular brackets for everything (all IRIs), or nothing (not just IRIs as types). > You leave stuff alone that's already in use. Being non-disruptive is the gain. Nobody uses angular brackets in URL parameters, which is what this features is about. More disruptive to add them than not to. > If you are dealing with parameters then why not represented references (URIs) using ^^xsd:anyURI Then client and server have to have a common set of prefixes. Best, Ruben
Received on Friday, 22 August 2014 10:33:25 UTC