- From: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
- Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2014 12:46:11 +0200
- To: "'Dimitri van Hees'" <info@dimitrivanhees.com>
- Cc: <public-hydra@w3.org>
+CC public-hydra On Friday, August 01, 2014 9:04 AM, Dimitri van Hees wrote: >>> Ok, would this response make sense then? http://pastebin.com/utYVDXt1 >>> >> Yep, definitely. Please note though that some properties (such as the very >> interesting "interests") would be dropped when expanding that document as >> they are not mapped to a URL. > > Yes, I noticed that. What is best practice to deal with those properties? Just > map it to non-existing URI's or leave them out as they don't make sense in LD > without a proper mapping? It's better to leave them out in that case IMO. That way people don't start to depend on specific mappings which would make it difficult to change it to something meaningful later on. The best is of course to map everything :-) > By the way, as far as I can see there is still room > for lots of vocabularies on the WWW and also room for improvement at schema.org… Oh yeah, definitely. -- Markus Lanthaler @markuslanthaler
Received on Friday, 1 August 2014 10:46:46 UTC