RE: Moving forward with ISSUE-30 (IRI template expansion)

On 13 Aug 2014 at 09:36, Ruben Verborgh wrote:
>>> If you want the template itself to be processed differently, then
>>> you are changing the semantics of RFC6570. In other words, the IRI
>>> template isn't RFC6570 conformant anymore. This touches ISSUE-17
>>> [6] for which we have a
>>>
>>>   PROPOSAL: Introduce a datatype for RFC6570 IRI templates, but
>>>   don't change the range of  hydra:template . Update the Hydra
>>>   JSON-LD context to type-coerce template automatically.
>>>
>>> Perhaps we should try to close ISSUE-30 and ISSUE-17 at the same
>>> time instead of postponing the decision on ISSUE-17!?
>
> Markus, you said elsewhere that we don't have the goal of describing
> *any* API, i.e., that APIs sometimes have to follow what Hydra
> prescribes. The above seems to conflict with that. Any insights into
> this?


I don't follow. Why does this conflict with that statement? Actually, I
can't see any connection between these statements.


--
Markus Lanthaler
@markuslanthaler

Received on Wednesday, 13 August 2014 10:20:29 UTC