- From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
- Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2014 09:29:19 -0700
- To: Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be>
- Cc: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>, public-hydra@w3.org
I think you've done a good job of phrasing this. Note, however, that there is a working group (CSVW) with a charter a "CSV file with thousands of numbers" useful as Linked Data. Gregg Kellogg gregg@greggkellogg.net On Aug 6, 2014, at 9:09 AM, Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be> wrote: >> This combination of structure and URLs is the essence of Linked Data >> >> What exactly do you mean by *structure* in this context? Could we simplify >> it by saying "This usage of URLs is the essence..."? Or do you think we >> would lose something if we did? > > I tried to refer back to the sentence above: > > Machines prefer structured data using unambiguous identifiers. > > That closes the story about Linked Data then. > Perhaps this can be done clearer? > > Note that the structure is indeed important: > HTML pages have a lot of URLs too, but we can't do the same things. > > Ruben >
Received on Wednesday, 6 August 2014 16:29:51 UTC