- From: Erik Wilde <dret@berkeley.edu>
- Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2014 13:49:23 -0700
- To: public-hydra@w3.org
hello. i raised this issue on github, but then markus pointed out that discussions should be on the mailing list, and not on github. so here's the issue: https://github.com/HydraCG/Specifications/issues/66 since i have a lot of people asking this question, i am wondering if it would be helpful (and appropriate) to specifically define linked data as the RDF flavor of linked data (with this latter one being the more generic concept of just "data that is linked"). we as a community have had this discussion ad nauseam, but not everybody is following the community closely. i don't want to start a discussion about the topic itself, i am simply suggesting to make it clear to readers not knowing the history of the term that the spec is specifically about the RDF flavor. that helps people a lot, at least those people i talk to that get confused about rather generic terms such as "linked data" or "web of data", and the more constrained ways in which the communities are using those terms. my personal history about this goes back to http://dret.typepad.com/dretblog/2009/11/the-linked-data-police.html, and if people think it would be appropriate and helpful to add some clarification, i can contribute a paragraph or two. thanks, dret.
Received on Monday, 4 August 2014 20:49:48 UTC