Re: Has ISSUE-66 been properly addressed?

hello markus.

On 2014-08-08, 2:43 , Markus Lanthaler wrote:
> ISSUE-66 [1] was raised by Erik. There have been lots of discussions and as
> far as I can tell, Ruben has implemented all feedback in the spec apart my
> comment in [2]. I don't see that as a blocker though. Has this issue been
> adequately addressed?
> I'm primarily asking you, Erik, here (CCed) as you raised this issue in the
> first place but of course everyone is welcome to comment.

i am fine with what was proposed (thanks, ruben, for your suggestions), 
and apologize for the traffic volume. i was trying (unsuccessfully) to 
avoid the well-known perma-discussion, accusations, and conspiracy theories.

my only point was to raise the issue that i meet a lot of people who are 
not aware of the fact that linked data has a narrow definition, and just 
understand the term as "data that is linked". explaining this is, imho, 
the price you have to pay when you use very natural-language term to 
mean something specific.

over and out,

dret.

Received on Friday, 8 August 2014 15:20:07 UTC