- From: John Walker <john.walker@semaku.com>
- Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2014 17:15:25 +0300
- To: Andreas Kuckartz <a.kuckartz@ping.de>
- Cc: Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be>, "public-hydra@w3.org" <public-hydra@w3.org>
On 5 Aug 2014, at 12:54, "Andreas Kuckartz" <a.kuckartz@ping.de> wrote: > Ruben Verborgh: >> And personally, I wonder to what extent SPARQL is part of Linked Data; >> and does that mean the query language, the protocol, or both? > > One can provide and consume Linked Data without touching SPARQL. > > Cheers, > Andreas > Isn't that like asking I wonder to what extent SQL is part of RDBMS. Sure you can do relational without SQL, but for many many people the two are virtually synonymous. I would also counter Andreas' point by saying I see more and more people creating and consuming Linked Data _solely_ using SPARQL 1.1 (and by extension Turtle). John
Received on Tuesday, 5 August 2014 14:15:56 UTC