Re: [dxwg] property profileOfTransitive (#486)
Re: [dxwg] DCAT 2014 profile of DCAT (#144)
Closed: [dxwg] Definition of prof:isProfileOf (#1068)
Re: [dxwg] Definition of prof:isProfileOf (#1068)
Closed: [dxwg] Suggested updates to definition of PROF constructs (#1061)
Closed: [dxwg] PROF namespace in document (#798)
Re: [dxwg] PROF namespace in document (#798)
Closed: [dxwg] PROF relationship to other vocabularies (#797)
Re: [dxwg] PROF relationship to other vocabularies (#797)
Closed: [dxwg] Machine understanding of "profile" (#796)
Re: [dxwg] Machine understanding of "profile" (#796)
Closed: [dxwg] ShEx community comment on resource descriptor (#794)
Closed: [dxwg] What does prof:profileOf entail? (#507)
Closed: [dxwg] Provide an example of both a profile and a resource adhereing to it (#455)
Closed: [dxwg] Reference ADMS (#401)
Re: [dxwg] Reference ADMS (#401)
[dxwg] Update RDF links from PROF NS to latest files (#1199)
[dxwg] Review VoID relations for possible isProfileOf specialisations (#1198)
[dxwg] new commits pushed by dr-shorthair
[dxwg] Is one of dcat:accessURL, dcat:accessService and dcat:downloadURL required in a dcat:Distribution? (#1197)
- Re: [dxwg] Is one of dcat:accessURL, dcat:accessService and dcat:downloadURL required in a dcat:Distribution? (#1197)
- Re: [dxwg] Is one of dcat:accessURL, dcat:accessService and dcat:downloadURL required in a dcat:Distribution? (#1197)
- Re: [dxwg] Is one of dcat:accessURL, dcat:accessService and dcat:downloadURL required in a dcat:Distribution? (#1197)
- Re: [dxwg] Is one of dcat:accessURL, dcat:accessService and dcat:downloadURL required in a dcat:Distribution? (#1197)
- Re: [dxwg] Is one of dcat:accessURL, dcat:accessService and dcat:downloadURL required in a dcat:Distribution? (#1197)
PROF is now published as a NOTE
[dxwg] Pull Request: Rename dcat-tr-to-pr to dcat-tr-to-pr.md
[dxwg] new commits pushed by dr-shorthair
[dxwg] new commits pushed by dr-shorthair
[dxwg] Content negotiation for http://www.w3.org/ns/dcat# (#1196)
[dxwg] new commits pushed by riccardoAlbertoni
Re: [dxwg] Update to Intro (#1174)
[dxwg] DCAT: Proposal for an updated definition for the concept “dataset” (#1195)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT: Proposal for an updated definition for the concept “dataset” (#1195)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT: Proposal for an updated definition for the concept “dataset” (#1195)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT: Proposal for an updated definition for the concept “dataset” (#1195)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT: Proposal for an updated definition for the concept “dataset” (#1195)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT: Proposal for an updated definition for the concept “dataset” (#1195)
[dxwg] Pull Request: Change RDF filename to dcat2.ttl
[dxwg] Pull Request: Change RDF filename to dcat2.ttl
- Re: [dxwg] Change RDF filename to dcat2.ttl (#1194)
- Re: [dxwg] Change RDF filename to dcat2.ttl (#1194)
[dxwg] Rename DCATv2 RDF file dcat2.ttl (#1193)
- Re: [dxwg] Rename DCATv2 RDF file dcat2.ttl (#1193)
- Closed: [dxwg] Rename DCATv2 RDF file dcat2.ttl (#1193)
[dxwg] User proper document license in W3C documents (#1192)
License for DCAT vocabulary?
DXWG Plenary 2019-12-17 - CHRISTMAS & NEW YEAR BREAK
[dxwg] new commits pushed by riccardoAlbertoni
PROF to WG Note
[dxwg] Pull Request: update contact in w3c.json
[dxwg] new commits pushed by nicholascar
[dxwg] Pull Request: PR for issue #1177
[dxwg] Pull Request: PR for issue #1177
DXWG Plenary - 2019-12-10 - Holiday period
[dxwg] new commits pushed by rob-metalinkage
[dxwg] Pull Request: Addressing Annette's poll comments and many more wording tidy-ups
[dxwg] Pull Request: Addressing Annette's poll comments and many more wording tidy-ups
[dxwg] Pull Request: small editorial change for dcat:Catalog definition
[dxwg] Pull Request: small editorial change for dcat:Catalog definition
- Re: [dxwg] small editorial change for dcat:Catalog definition (#1188)
- Re: [dxwg] small editorial change for dcat:Catalog definition (#1188)
- Re: [dxwg] small editorial change for dcat:Catalog definition (#1188)
- Re: [dxwg] small editorial change for dcat:Catalog definition (#1188)
[dxwg] Unclear classification of dataset/resources (#1187)
[dxwg] Possible mismatch between the stated scope in the non-normative text and the vocabulary specification (#1186)
[dxwg] Pull Request: Editorial fixes
[dxwg] Pull Request: Editorial fixes
Re: [dxwg] ShEx community comment on resource descriptor (#794)
- Re: [dxwg] ShEx community comment on resource descriptor (#794)
- Re: [dxwg] ShEx community comment on resource descriptor (#794)
Closed: [dxwg] Find from a profile description, uris of online resources available to convert it to another profile (#754)
Closed: [dxwg] Profiles Ontology Figure 3 (#731)
Closed: [dxwg] Indicate a conventional way to automatically validate data instances of application profiles (#698)
Closed: [dxwg] Visual clues in Figures 3 and 4 (#689)
Closed: [dxwg] Clarify use of dct:conformsTo perhaps with additional properties (#660)
Re: [dxwg] What does prof:profileOf entail? (#507)
Closed: [dxwg] Complete CSIRO's profiles implementation description (#408)
Closed: [dxwg] Prof Ont Test Suite tools (#407)
Re: [dxwg] Prof Ont Test Suite tools (#407)
[dxwg] Improve the SHACL file for PROF instances (#1184)
Closed: [dxwg] PROF - ADMS alignment (#240)
Re: [dxwg] PROF - ADMS alignment (#240)
Closed: [dxwg] From SHACL: profile and "base ontology" (#799)
Closed: [dxwg] Axiomitise transitivity of dct:conformsTo through isProfileOf relationships (#844)
Re: [dxwg] Suggested updates to definition of PROF constructs (#1061)
Grammatical fixes for PROF
DXWG Plenary: 2019-12-03
Re: [dxwg] Are we superseding DCAT 1 or not once DCAT 2 is a REC? (#1177)
- Re: [dxwg] Are we superseding DCAT 1 or not once DCAT 2 is a REC? (#1177)
- Re: [dxwg] Are we superseding DCAT 1 or not once DCAT 2 is a REC? (#1177)
- Re: [dxwg] Are we superseding DCAT 1 or not once DCAT 2 is a REC? (#1177)
- Re: [dxwg] Are we superseding DCAT 1 or not once DCAT 2 is a REC? (#1177)
- Re: [dxwg] Are we superseding DCAT 1 or not once DCAT 2 is a REC? (#1177)
- Re: [dxwg] Are we superseding DCAT 1 or not once DCAT 2 is a REC? (#1177)
- Re: [dxwg] Are we superseding DCAT 1 or not once DCAT 2 is a REC? (#1177)
- Re: [dxwg] Are we superseding DCAT 1 or not once DCAT 2 is a REC? (#1177)
- Re: [dxwg] Are we superseding DCAT 1 or not once DCAT 2 is a REC? (#1177)
- Re: [dxwg] Are we superseding DCAT 1 or not once DCAT 2 is a REC? (#1177)
- Re: [dxwg] Are we superseding DCAT 1 or not once DCAT 2 is a REC? (#1177)