Re: DXWG Plenary: 2019-12-03

You are right that there isn't an abstain, but we do need to know whether
the group supports the publication of this note. So it would be good to
hear from others if they would have voted if there had been an "abstain"
option. We have time to do another poll if that is the case.

kc

On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 3:21 AM Annette Greiner <amgreiner@lbl.gov> wrote:

> It does merit pointing out that the poll did not offer the opportunity to
> abstain except by declining to fill it in, which most of us did.
>
> -Annette
> On 12/2/19 3:26 AM, pedro winstley wrote:
>
> Dear Colleagues
>
> The plenary meeting is cancelled.  There are issues listed in the agenda
> that we will deal with by correspondence.
>
> https://www.w3.org/2017/dxwg/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2019.12.03
>
> These are:
>
>
>    - The Conneg PWD 3 poll results (
>    https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/99375/Conneg3PWD/results ) show 10 in
>    favour and no abstentions
>
>
>    - The general consensus on the DCAT v1 discussion is that we intend to
>    supercede DCAT1 when version 2 becomes a standard and that we decide on the
>    formulation of text and links in the top of the DCAT1 page in
>    https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1177. Please add your thoughts here
>
>
>    - There are only a few hours left to complete
>    https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/99375/prof-publish  Please cast your
>    votes
>
>
>
> Many thanks
>
> Peter & Karen - chairs
>
>
> --
> Annette Greiner (she)
> NERSC Data and Analytics Services
> Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
>
>
>

-- 
--  ---
Karen Coyle / Digital Library Consultant
kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://www.kcoyle.net
ph.: 510-540-7596   skype: kcoylenet
mo.: 510-435-8234
------------------------------------