Re: License for DCAT vocabulary?

Hi Alejandra,

At the moment in the DCAT TTL and the other RDF serializations, we have the

> dct:license <>

If I remember well, we inserted this link when validating of DCAT by mean

I do not know if we want to change it or if you think the license should
also be mentioned elsewhere.


On Mon, 16 Dec 2019 at 18:25, Alejandra Gonzalez-Beltran <> wrote:

> Hi All,
> We have not assigned a license to the DCAT vocabulary and I think it would
> be important to set one.
> I was trying to check if W3C has a policy around this, but I found this
> thread from the PROV list:
> but it seems that there was no conclusion.
> FYI, many of the OBO foundry ontologies ( use
> CC-BY (, which I think would
> be an appropriate license?
> Thanks,
> Alejandra
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by
> *E.F.A. Project* <>, and is believed to be
> clean.

Riccardo Albertoni
Istituto per la Matematica Applicata e Tecnologie Informatiche "Enrico
Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche
via de Marini 6 - 16149 GENOVA - ITALIA
tel. +39-010-6475624 - fax +39-010-6475660
Skype: callto://riccardoalbertoni/

Received on Monday, 16 December 2019 17:54:45 UTC