- Re: [sensors] Add mitigation strategy for skimming attacks when focus is lost. Alexander Shalamov via GitHub (Friday, 26 May)
- Re: [sensors] Add mitigation strategy for skimming attacks when focus is lost. Tobie Langel via GitHub (Friday, 26 May)
- Re: [sensors] Add mitigation strategy for skimming attacks when focus is lost. Alexander Shalamov via GitHub (Friday, 26 May)
- Re: [sensors] Add mitigation strategy for skimming attacks when focus is lost. Tobie Langel via GitHub (Friday, 26 May)
- Re: [sensors] Add mitigation strategy for skimming attacks when focus is lost. Tobie Langel via GitHub (Tuesday, 30 May)
- Re: [sensors] Add mitigation strategy for skimming attacks when focus is lost. Mikhail Pozdnyakov via GitHub (Tuesday, 30 May)
- Re: [sensors] Add mitigation strategy for skimming attacks when focus is lost. Tobie Langel via GitHub (Tuesday, 30 May)
- Re: [sensors] Add mitigation strategy for skimming attacks when focus is lost. Mikhail Pozdnyakov via GitHub (Tuesday, 30 May)
- Re: [sensors] Add mitigation strategy for skimming attacks when focus is lost. Tobie Langel via GitHub (Tuesday, 30 May)
- Re: [sensors] Add mitigation strategy for skimming attacks when focus is lost. Alexander Shalamov via GitHub (Tuesday, 30 May)
- Re: [sensors] Add mitigation strategy for skimming attacks when focus is lost. Tobie Langel via GitHub (Tuesday, 30 May)
- Re: [sensors] Add mitigation strategy for skimming attacks when focus is lost. Alexander Shalamov via GitHub (Tuesday, 30 May)
- Re: [sensors] Add mitigation strategy for skimming attacks when focus is lost. Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub (Tuesday, 30 May)
- Re: [sensors] Add mitigation strategy for skimming attacks when focus is lost. Tobie Langel via GitHub (Tuesday, 30 May)
- Re: [sensors] Add mitigation strategy for skimming attacks when focus is lost. Tobie Langel via GitHub (Tuesday, 30 May)
- Re: [sensors] Add mitigation strategy for skimming attacks when focus is lost. Alexander Shalamov via GitHub (Tuesday, 30 May)
- Re: [sensors] Add mitigation strategy for skimming attacks when focus is lost. Tobie Langel via GitHub (Tuesday, 30 May)
- Re: [sensors] Add mitigation strategy for skimming attacks when focus is lost. Alexander Shalamov via GitHub (Tuesday, 30 May)
- Re: [sensors] Add mitigation strategy for skimming attacks when focus is lost. Tobie Langel via GitHub (Tuesday, 30 May)
- Re: [sensors] Add mitigation strategy for skimming attacks when focus is lost. Alexander Shalamov via GitHub (Tuesday, 30 May)
- Re: [sensors] Add mitigation strategy for skimming attacks when focus is lost. Tobie Langel via GitHub (Tuesday, 30 May)
- Re: [sensors] Add mitigation strategy for skimming attacks when focus is lost. Alexander Shalamov via GitHub (Tuesday, 30 May)
- Re: [sensors] Use simple event dispatch mechanism instead of task source (queued) Alexander Shalamov via GitHub (Friday, 26 May)
- Re: [sensors] Use simple event dispatch mechanism instead of task source (queued) Tobie Langel via GitHub (Friday, 26 May)
- Re: [sensors] Use simple event dispatch mechanism instead of task source (queued) Mikhail Pozdnyakov via GitHub (Friday, 26 May)
- Re: [sensors] Use simple event dispatch mechanism instead of task source (queued) Tobie Langel via GitHub (Friday, 26 May)
- Re: [sensors] Use simple event dispatch mechanism instead of task source (queued) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub (Friday, 26 May)
- Re: [sensors] Use simple event dispatch mechanism instead of task source (queued) Alexander Shalamov via GitHub (Friday, 26 May)
- Re: [sensors] Use simple event dispatch mechanism instead of task source (queued) Tobie Langel via GitHub (Friday, 26 May)
- Re: [sensors] Use simple event dispatch mechanism instead of task source (queued) Alexander Shalamov via GitHub (Friday, 26 May)
- Re: [sensors] Use simple event dispatch mechanism instead of task source (queued) Tobie Langel via GitHub (Friday, 26 May)
- Re: [sensors] Use simple event dispatch mechanism instead of task source (queued) Tobie Langel via GitHub (Friday, 26 May)
- Re: [sensors] Use simple event dispatch mechanism instead of task source (queued) Alexander Shalamov via GitHub (Friday, 26 May)
- Re: [sensors] Use simple event dispatch mechanism instead of task source (queued) Tobie Langel via GitHub (Friday, 26 May)
- Re: [sensors] Use simple event dispatch mechanism instead of task source (queued) Alexander Shalamov via GitHub (Friday, 26 May)
- Re: [sensors] Use simple event dispatch mechanism instead of task source (queued) Alexander Shalamov via GitHub (Friday, 26 May)
- Re: [sensors] Use simple event dispatch mechanism instead of task source (queued) Tobie Langel via GitHub (Friday, 26 May)
- Re: [sensors] Use simple event dispatch mechanism instead of task source (queued) Tobie Langel via GitHub (Friday, 26 May)
- Re: [sensors] Use simple event dispatch mechanism instead of task source (queued) Alexander Shalamov via GitHub (Friday, 26 May)
- Re: [sensors] Use simple event dispatch mechanism instead of task source (queued) Alexander Shalamov via GitHub (Friday, 26 May)
- Re: [sensors] Use simple event dispatch mechanism instead of task source (queued) Tobie Langel via GitHub (Friday, 26 May)
- Re: [sensors] Use simple event dispatch mechanism instead of task source (queued) Tobie Langel via GitHub (Friday, 26 May)
- Re: [sensors] Use simple event dispatch mechanism instead of task source (queued) Alexander Shalamov via GitHub (Friday, 26 May)
- Re: [sensors] Use simple event dispatch mechanism instead of task source (queued) Tobie Langel via GitHub (Friday, 26 May)
- Re: [sensors] Use simple event dispatch mechanism instead of task source (queued) Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub (Friday, 26 May)
- Re: [sensors] Use simple event dispatch mechanism instead of task source (queued) Alexander Shalamov via GitHub (Friday, 26 May)
- Re: [sensors] Use simple event dispatch mechanism instead of task source (queued) Tobie Langel via GitHub (Friday, 26 May)
- Re: [sensors] Use simple event dispatch mechanism instead of task source (queued) Tobie Langel via GitHub (Friday, 26 May)
- Re: [sensors] Use simple event dispatch mechanism instead of task source (queued) Tobie Langel via GitHub (Friday, 26 May)
- Re: [sensors] Use simple event dispatch mechanism instead of task source (queued) Alexander Shalamov via GitHub (Saturday, 27 May)
- Re: [sensors] Use ''sampling frequency" instead of "polling frequency" Tobie Langel via GitHub (Tuesday, 23 May)
- Re: [sensors] Use ''sampling frequency" instead of "polling frequency" Mikhail Pozdnyakov via GitHub (Friday, 26 May)
- Re: [sensors] Use ''sampling frequency" instead of "polling frequency" Alexander Shalamov via GitHub (Friday, 26 May)
- Re: [sensors] Use ''sampling frequency" instead of "polling frequency" Tobie Langel via GitHub (Friday, 26 May)
- Re: [sensors] Use ''sampling frequency" instead of "polling frequency" Alexander Shalamov via GitHub (Friday, 26 May)
- Re: [sensors] Use ''sampling frequency" instead of "polling frequency" Tobie Langel via GitHub (Friday, 26 May)
- Re: [sensors] Use ''sampling frequency" instead of "polling frequency" Alexander Shalamov via GitHub (Friday, 26 May)
- Re: [sensors] Use ''sampling frequency" instead of "polling frequency" Mikhail Pozdnyakov via GitHub (Friday, 26 May)
- Re: [sensors] Use ''sampling frequency" instead of "polling frequency" Tobie Langel via GitHub (Friday, 26 May)
- Re: [sensors] Use ''sampling frequency" instead of "polling frequency" Alexander Shalamov via GitHub (Friday, 26 May)
- Re: [sensors] Use ''sampling frequency" instead of "polling frequency" Mikhail Pozdnyakov via GitHub (Friday, 26 May)
- Re: [sensors] Use ''sampling frequency" instead of "polling frequency" Mikhail Pozdnyakov via GitHub (Friday, 26 May)
- Re: [sensors] Use ''sampling frequency" instead of "polling frequency" Mikhail Pozdnyakov via GitHub (Friday, 26 May)
- Re: [sensors] Use ''sampling frequency" instead of "polling frequency" Alexander Shalamov via GitHub (Friday, 26 May)
- Re: [sensors] Use ''sampling frequency" instead of "polling frequency" Tobie Langel via GitHub (Friday, 26 May)
- Re: [sensors] Use ''sampling frequency" instead of "polling frequency" Mikhail Pozdnyakov via GitHub (Friday, 26 May)
- Re: [sensors] Use ''sampling frequency" instead of "polling frequency" Tobie Langel via GitHub (Friday, 26 May)
- Re: [sensors] Use ''sampling frequency" instead of "polling frequency" Mikhail Pozdnyakov via GitHub (Friday, 26 May)
- Re: [sensors] Use ''sampling frequency" instead of "polling frequency" Tobie Langel via GitHub (Friday, 26 May)
- Re: [sensors] Use ''sampling frequency" instead of "polling frequency" Mikhail Pozdnyakov via GitHub (Friday, 26 May)
- Re: [sensors] Use ''sampling frequency" instead of "polling frequency" Tobie Langel via GitHub (Friday, 26 May)
- Re: [sensors] Use ''sampling frequency" instead of "polling frequency" Mikhail Pozdnyakov via GitHub (Friday, 26 May)
- Re: [sensors] Use ''sampling frequency" instead of "polling frequency" Tobie Langel via GitHub (Friday, 26 May)
- Re: [sensors] Use ''sampling frequency" instead of "polling frequency" Mikhail Pozdnyakov via GitHub (Friday, 26 May)
- Re: [sensors] Use ''sampling frequency" instead of "polling frequency" Alexander Shalamov via GitHub (Friday, 26 May)
- Re: [sensors] Use ''sampling frequency" instead of "polling frequency" Tobie Langel via GitHub (Friday, 26 May)
- Re: [sensors] Use ''sampling frequency" instead of "polling frequency" Mikhail Pozdnyakov via GitHub (Friday, 26 May)
- Re: [sensors] Use ''sampling frequency" instead of "polling frequency" Tobie Langel via GitHub (Friday, 26 May)
- Re: [sensors] Use ''sampling frequency" instead of "polling frequency" Tobie Langel via GitHub (Friday, 26 May)
- Re: [sensors] Add 'user triggered activation' as mitigation strategy Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub (Monday, 22 May)
- Re: [sensors] Add 'user triggered activation' as mitigation strategy Tobie Langel via GitHub (Monday, 22 May)
- Re: [sensors] Add 'user triggered activation' as mitigation strategy Alexander Shalamov via GitHub (Monday, 22 May)
- Re: [sensors] Add 'user triggered activation' as mitigation strategy Tobie Langel via GitHub (Monday, 22 May)
- Re: [sensors] Add 'user triggered activation' as mitigation strategy Alexander Shalamov via GitHub (Monday, 22 May)
- Re: [sensors] Add 'user triggered activation' as mitigation strategy Tobie Langel via GitHub (Monday, 22 May)
- Re: [sensors] Add 'user triggered activation' as mitigation strategy Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub (Monday, 22 May)
- Re: [sensors] Add 'user triggered activation' as mitigation strategy Alexander Shalamov via GitHub (Monday, 22 May)
- Re: [sensors] Add 'user triggered activation' as mitigation strategy Tobie Langel via GitHub (Monday, 22 May)
- Re: [sensors] Add 'user triggered activation' as mitigation strategy Alexander Shalamov via GitHub (Monday, 22 May)
- Re: [sensors] Add 'user triggered activation' as mitigation strategy Tobie Langel via GitHub (Monday, 22 May)
- Re: [sensors] Add 'user triggered activation' as mitigation strategy Alexander Shalamov via GitHub (Monday, 22 May)
- Re: [sensors] Add 'user triggered activation' as mitigation strategy Tobie Langel via GitHub (Monday, 22 May)
- Closed: [sensors] The Handle Errors abstract operation must deactivate the Sensor object Tobie Langel via GitHub (Friday, 19 May)
- Re: [sensors] The Handle Errors abstract operation must deactivate the Sensor object Tobie Langel via GitHub (Friday, 19 May)
- Re: [sensors] The Handle Errors abstract operation must deactivate the Sensor object Mikhail Pozdnyakov via GitHub (Friday, 19 May)
- Re: [sensors] The Handle Errors abstract operation must deactivate the activated Sensor object Tobie Langel via GitHub (Friday, 19 May)
- Closed: [sensors] The Handle Errors abstract operation must deactivate the activated Sensor object Tobie Langel via GitHub (Friday, 19 May)
- Re: [sensors] The Handle Errors abstract operation must deactivate the activated Sensor object Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub (Monday, 22 May)
- Re: [sensors] The Handle Errors abstract operation must deactivate the activated Sensor object Tobie Langel via GitHub (Monday, 22 May)
- Re: [sensors] The Handle Errors abstract operation must deactivate the activated Sensor object Mikhail Pozdnyakov via GitHub (Monday, 22 May)
- Re: [sensors] The Handle Errors abstract operation must deactivate the activated Sensor object Tobie Langel via GitHub (Monday, 22 May)
- Re: [sensors] The Handle Errors abstract operation must deactivate the activated Sensor object Tobie Langel via GitHub (Tuesday, 30 May)
- Closed: [sensors] The Handle Errors abstract operation must deactivate the activated Sensor object Tobie Langel via GitHub (Tuesday, 30 May)
- Re: [sensors] Define processing model Tobie Langel via GitHub (Friday, 19 May)
- Re: [sensors] Define processing model Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub (Monday, 22 May)
- Re: [sensors] Define processing model Tobie Langel via GitHub (Monday, 22 May)
- Re: [sensors] Define processing model Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub (Monday, 22 May)
- Re: [sensors] Define processing model Mikhail Pozdnyakov via GitHub (Monday, 22 May)
- Re: [sensors] Define processing model Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub (Tuesday, 23 May)
- Re: [sensors] Define processing model Tobie Langel via GitHub (Tuesday, 23 May)
- Re: [sensors] Define processing model Alexander Shalamov via GitHub (Wednesday, 24 May)
- Re: [sensors] Define processing model Tobie Langel via GitHub (Wednesday, 24 May)
- Re: [sensors] Define processing model Alexander Shalamov via GitHub (Wednesday, 24 May)
- Re: [sensors] Define processing model Tobie Langel via GitHub (Wednesday, 24 May)
- Re: [sensors] Define processing model Alexander Shalamov via GitHub (Wednesday, 24 May)
- Re: [sensors] Define processing model Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub (Wednesday, 24 May)
- Re: [sensors] Define processing model Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub (Friday, 26 May)
- Re: [sensors] Define processing model Tobie Langel via GitHub (Friday, 26 May)
- Re: [sensors] Define processing model Alexander Shalamov via GitHub (Friday, 26 May)
- Re: [sensors] Define processing model Tobie Langel via GitHub (Friday, 26 May)
- Re: [sensors] Define processing model Mikhail Pozdnyakov via GitHub (Friday, 26 May)
- Re: [sensors] Define processing model Tobie Langel via GitHub (Friday, 26 May)
- Re: [sensors] Define processing model Alexander Shalamov via GitHub (Friday, 26 May)
- Re: [sensors] Define processing model Mikhail Pozdnyakov via GitHub (Friday, 26 May)
- Re: [sensors] Define processing model Tobie Langel via GitHub (Friday, 26 May)
- Re: [sensors] Define processing model Tobie Langel via GitHub (Friday, 26 May)
- Re: [sensors] Define processing model Alexander Shalamov via GitHub (Friday, 26 May)
- Re: [sensors] Define processing model Tobie Langel via GitHub (Friday, 26 May)
- Re: [sensors] Define processing model Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub (Monday, 29 May)
- Re: [sensors] Define processing model Tobie Langel via GitHub (Monday, 29 May)
- Re: [sensors] Define processing model Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub (Tuesday, 30 May)
- Re: [sensors] Define processing model Tobie Langel via GitHub (Tuesday, 30 May)
- Re: [sensors] Define processing model Mikhail Pozdnyakov via GitHub (Wednesday, 31 May)
- Re: [sensors] Rewrite Abstract Operations Mikhail Pozdnyakov via GitHub (Thursday, 18 May)
- Re: [sensors] Rewrite Abstract Operations Tobie Langel via GitHub (Thursday, 18 May)
- Re: [sensors] Rewrite Abstract Operations Tobie Langel via GitHub (Thursday, 18 May)
- Re: [sensors] Rewrite Abstract Operations Mikhail Pozdnyakov via GitHub (Friday, 19 May)
- Re: [sensors] Rewrite Abstract Operations Tobie Langel via GitHub (Friday, 19 May)
- Re: [sensors] Rewrite Abstract Operations Mikhail Pozdnyakov via GitHub (Friday, 19 May)
- Re: [sensors] Rewrite Abstract Operations Tobie Langel via GitHub (Friday, 19 May)
- Re: [sensors] Rewrite Abstract Operations Tobie Langel via GitHub (Monday, 22 May)
- Re: [sensors] Rewrite Abstract Operations Mikhail Pozdnyakov via GitHub (Monday, 22 May)
- Re: [sensors] Rewrite Abstract Operations Mikhail Pozdnyakov via GitHub (Monday, 22 May)
- Re: [sensors] Rewrite Abstract Operations Tobie Langel via GitHub (Monday, 22 May)
- Re: [sensors] Rewrite Abstract Operations Mikhail Pozdnyakov via GitHub (Tuesday, 23 May)
- Re: [sensors] Rewrite Abstract Operations Tobie Langel via GitHub (Tuesday, 23 May)
- Re: [sensors] Rewrite Abstract Operations Mikhail Pozdnyakov via GitHub (Tuesday, 23 May)
- Re: [sensors] Rewrite Abstract Operations Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub (Tuesday, 23 May)
- Re: [sensors] Rewrite Abstract Operations Tobie Langel via GitHub (Tuesday, 23 May)
- Re: [sensors] Rewrite Abstract Operations Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub (Friday, 26 May)
- Re: [sensors] Rewrite Abstract Operations Tobie Langel via GitHub (Friday, 26 May)
- Re: [sensors] Rewrite Abstract Operations Alexander Shalamov via GitHub (Friday, 26 May)
- Re: [sensors] Rewrite Abstract Operations Tobie Langel via GitHub (Friday, 26 May)
- Re: [magnetometer] Add RawMagnetometer, for uncalibrated readings. Tobie Langel via GitHub (Wednesday, 10 May)
- Re: [magnetometer] Add RawMagnetometer, for uncalibrated readings. Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub (Wednesday, 10 May)
- Re: [magnetometer] Add RawMagnetometer, for uncalibrated readings. Tobie Langel via GitHub (Wednesday, 10 May)
- Re: [magnetometer] Add RawMagnetometer, for uncalibrated readings. Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub (Wednesday, 10 May)
- Re: [magnetometer] Add RawMagnetometer, for uncalibrated readings. Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub (Wednesday, 10 May)
- Re: [magnetometer] Add RawMagnetometer, for uncalibrated readings. Rijubrata Bhaumik via GitHub (Wednesday, 10 May)
- Re: [magnetometer] Add RawMagnetometer, for uncalibrated readings. Tobie Langel via GitHub (Wednesday, 10 May)
- Re: [magnetometer] Add RawMagnetometer, for uncalibrated readings. Tobie Langel via GitHub (Wednesday, 10 May)
- Re: [magnetometer] Add RawMagnetometer, for uncalibrated readings. Tobie Langel via GitHub (Wednesday, 10 May)
- Re: [magnetometer] Add RawMagnetometer, for uncalibrated readings. Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub (Thursday, 11 May)
- Re: [magnetometer] Add RawMagnetometer, for uncalibrated readings. Tobie Langel via GitHub (Thursday, 11 May)
- Re: [magnetometer] Add RawMagnetometer, for uncalibrated readings. Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub (Thursday, 11 May)
- Re: [magnetometer] Add RawMagnetometer, for uncalibrated readings. Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub (Thursday, 11 May)
- Re: [magnetometer] Add RawMagnetometer, for uncalibrated readings. Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub (Thursday, 11 May)
- Re: [magnetometer] Add RawMagnetometer, for uncalibrated readings. Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub (Thursday, 11 May)
- Re: [magnetometer] Add RawMagnetometer, for uncalibrated readings. Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub (Thursday, 11 May)
- Re: [magnetometer] Add RawMagnetometer, for uncalibrated readings. Tobie Langel via GitHub (Thursday, 11 May)
- Re: [magnetometer] Add RawMagnetometer, for uncalibrated readings. Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub (Thursday, 11 May)
- Re: [magnetometer] Add RawMagnetometer, for uncalibrated readings. Mikhail Pozdnyakov via GitHub (Thursday, 11 May)
- Re: [magnetometer] Add RawMagnetometer, for uncalibrated readings. Tobie Langel via GitHub (Thursday, 11 May)
- Re: [magnetometer] Add RawMagnetometer, for uncalibrated readings. Tobie Langel via GitHub (Thursday, 11 May)
- Re: [magnetometer] Add RawMagnetometer, for uncalibrated readings. Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub (Thursday, 11 May)
- Re: [magnetometer] Add RawMagnetometer, for uncalibrated readings. Tobie Langel via GitHub (Thursday, 11 May)
- Re: [magnetometer] Add RawMagnetometer, for uncalibrated readings. Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub (Thursday, 11 May)
- Re: [magnetometer] Add RawMagnetometer, for uncalibrated readings. Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub (Thursday, 11 May)
- Re: [magnetometer] Add RawMagnetometer, for uncalibrated readings. Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub (Thursday, 11 May)
- Re: [magnetometer] Add RawMagnetometer, for uncalibrated readings. Tobie Langel via GitHub (Thursday, 11 May)
- Re: [magnetometer] Add RawMagnetometer, for uncalibrated readings. Tobie Langel via GitHub (Thursday, 11 May)
- Re: [magnetometer] Add RawMagnetometer, for uncalibrated readings. Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub (Thursday, 11 May)
- Re: [magnetometer] Add RawMagnetometer, for uncalibrated readings. Alexander Shalamov via GitHub (Thursday, 11 May)
- Re: [magnetometer] Add RawMagnetometer, for uncalibrated readings. Tobie Langel via GitHub (Thursday, 11 May)
- Re: [magnetometer] Add RawMagnetometer, for uncalibrated readings. Alexander Shalamov via GitHub (Thursday, 11 May)
- Re: [magnetometer] Add RawMagnetometer, for uncalibrated readings. Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub (Thursday, 11 May)
- Re: [magnetometer] Add RawMagnetometer, for uncalibrated readings. Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub (Thursday, 11 May)
- Re: [magnetometer] Add RawMagnetometer, for uncalibrated readings. Alexander Shalamov via GitHub (Thursday, 11 May)
- Re: [magnetometer] Add RawMagnetometer, for uncalibrated readings. Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub (Thursday, 11 May)
- Re: [magnetometer] Add RawMagnetometer, for uncalibrated readings. Tobie Langel via GitHub (Thursday, 11 May)
- Re: [magnetometer] Add RawMagnetometer, for uncalibrated readings. Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub (Thursday, 11 May)
- Re: [magnetometer] Add RawMagnetometer, for uncalibrated readings. Tobie Langel via GitHub (Thursday, 11 May)
- Re: [magnetometer] Add RawMagnetometer, for uncalibrated readings. Alexander Shalamov via GitHub (Thursday, 11 May)
- Re: [magnetometer] Add RawMagnetometer, for uncalibrated readings. Tobie Langel via GitHub (Thursday, 11 May)
- Re: [magnetometer] Add RawMagnetometer, for uncalibrated readings. Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub (Thursday, 11 May)
- Re: [magnetometer] Add RawMagnetometer, for uncalibrated readings. Tobie Langel via GitHub (Thursday, 11 May)
- Re: [magnetometer] Add RawMagnetometer, for uncalibrated readings. Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub (Thursday, 11 May)
- Re: [magnetometer] Add RawMagnetometer, for uncalibrated readings. Tobie Langel via GitHub (Thursday, 11 May)
- Re: [magnetometer] Add RawMagnetometer, for uncalibrated readings. Tobie Langel via GitHub (Thursday, 11 May)
- Re: [magnetometer] Add RawMagnetometer, for uncalibrated readings. Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub (Thursday, 11 May)
- Re: [magnetometer] Add RawMagnetometer, for uncalibrated readings. Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub (Thursday, 11 May)
- Re: [magnetometer] Add RawMagnetometer, for uncalibrated readings. Rick Waldron via GitHub (Thursday, 11 May)
- Re: [sensors] First pass at adding sensor-specific mitigation strategies. Tobie Langel via GitHub (Thursday, 4 May)
- Re: [sensors] First pass at adding sensor-specific mitigation strategies. Tobie Langel via GitHub (Thursday, 4 May)
- Re: [sensors] First pass at adding sensor-specific mitigation strategies. Maryam Mehr via GitHub (Thursday, 4 May)
- Re: [sensors] First pass at adding sensor-specific mitigation strategies. Tobie Langel via GitHub (Thursday, 4 May)
- Re: [sensors] First pass at adding sensor-specific mitigation strategies. Maryam Mehr via GitHub (Thursday, 4 May)
- Re: [sensors] First pass at adding sensor-specific mitigation strategies. Tobie Langel via GitHub (Thursday, 4 May)
- Re: [sensors] First pass at adding sensor-specific mitigation strategies. Maryam Mehr via GitHub (Friday, 5 May)
- Re: [sensors] First pass at adding sensor-specific mitigation strategies. Tobie Langel via GitHub (Monday, 8 May)
- Re: [sensors] First pass at adding sensor-specific mitigation strategies. Tobie Langel via GitHub (Monday, 8 May)
- Re: [sensors] First pass at adding sensor-specific mitigation strategies. Tobie Langel via GitHub (Monday, 8 May)
- Re: [sensors] First pass at adding sensor-specific mitigation strategies. Tobie Langel via GitHub (Monday, 8 May)
- Re: [sensors] First pass at adding sensor-specific mitigation strategies. Tobie Langel via GitHub (Monday, 8 May)
- Re: [sensors] First pass at adding sensor-specific mitigation strategies. Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub (Monday, 15 May)
- Re: [sensors] Avoid PIN skimming attacks Mikhail Pozdnyakov via GitHub (Thursday, 4 May)
- Re: [sensors] Avoid PIN skimming attacks Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub (Thursday, 4 May)
- Re: [sensors] Avoid PIN skimming attacks Alexander Shalamov via GitHub (Thursday, 4 May)
- Re: [sensors] Avoid PIN skimming attacks Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub (Thursday, 4 May)
- Re: [sensors] Avoid PIN skimming attacks Tobie Langel via GitHub (Thursday, 4 May)
- Re: [sensors] Avoid PIN skimming attacks Mikhail Pozdnyakov via GitHub (Thursday, 4 May)
- Re: [sensors] Avoid PIN skimming attacks Tobie Langel via GitHub (Thursday, 4 May)
- Re: [sensors] Avoid PIN skimming attacks Mikhail Pozdnyakov via GitHub (Thursday, 4 May)
- Re: [sensors] Avoid PIN skimming attacks Tobie Langel via GitHub (Thursday, 4 May)
- Re: [sensors] Avoid PIN skimming attacks Alexander Shalamov via GitHub (Thursday, 4 May)
- Re: [sensors] Avoid PIN skimming attacks Tobie Langel via GitHub (Thursday, 4 May)
- Re: [sensors] Avoid PIN skimming attacks Mikhail Pozdnyakov via GitHub (Thursday, 4 May)
- Re: [sensors] Avoid PIN skimming attacks Mikhail Pozdnyakov via GitHub (Thursday, 4 May)
- Re: [sensors] Avoid PIN skimming attacks Alexander Shalamov via GitHub (Thursday, 4 May)
- Re: [sensors] Avoid PIN skimming attacks Tobie Langel via GitHub (Thursday, 4 May)
- Re: [sensors] Avoid PIN skimming attacks Tobie Langel via GitHub (Thursday, 4 May)
- Re: [sensors] Batching API for sensor readings Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub (Friday, 5 May)
- Re: [sensors] Batching API for sensor readings Tobie Langel via GitHub (Friday, 5 May)
- Re: [sensors] Batching API for sensor readings Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub (Friday, 5 May)
- Re: [sensors] Batching API for sensor readings Tobie Langel via GitHub (Friday, 5 May)
- Re: [sensors] Batching API for sensor readings Tobie Langel via GitHub (Friday, 5 May)
- Re: [sensors] Batching API for sensor readings Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub (Monday, 8 May)
- Re: [sensors] Batching API for sensor readings Mikhail Pozdnyakov via GitHub (Monday, 8 May)
- Re: [sensors] Batching API for sensor readings Mikhail Pozdnyakov via GitHub (Monday, 8 May)
- Re: [sensors] Batching API for sensor readings Tobie Langel via GitHub (Monday, 8 May)
- Re: [sensors] Batching API for sensor readings Tobie Langel via GitHub (Monday, 8 May)
- Re: [sensors] Batching API for sensor readings Mikhail Pozdnyakov via GitHub (Monday, 8 May)
- Re: [sensors] Batching API for sensor readings Tobie Langel via GitHub (Monday, 8 May)
- Re: [sensors] Batching API for sensor readings Tobie Langel via GitHub (Monday, 8 May)
- Re: [sensors] Batching API for sensor readings Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub (Monday, 8 May)
- Re: [sensors] Batching API for sensor readings Tobie Langel via GitHub (Monday, 8 May)
- Re: [sensors] Batching API for sensor readings Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub (Monday, 8 May)
- Re: [sensors] Batching API for sensor readings Mikhail Pozdnyakov via GitHub (Friday, 19 May)
- Re: [sensors] Call 'onchange' on a Senor instance considering its own frequency hint Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub (Friday, 26 May)
- Re: [sensors] Call 'onchange' on a Senor instance considering its own frequency hint Mikhail Pozdnyakov via GitHub (Friday, 26 May)
- Re: [sensors] Call 'onchange' on a Senor instance considering its own frequency hint Tobie Langel via GitHub (Friday, 26 May)
- Re: [sensors] Call 'onchange' on a Senor instance considering its own frequency hint Mikhail Pozdnyakov via GitHub (Friday, 26 May)
- Re: [sensors] Call 'onchange' on a Senor instance considering its own frequency hint Tobie Langel via GitHub (Friday, 26 May)
- Re: [sensors] Call 'onchange' on a Senor instance considering its own frequency hint Mikhail Pozdnyakov via GitHub (Friday, 26 May)
- Re: [sensors] Call 'onchange' on a Senor instance considering its own frequency hint Tobie Langel via GitHub (Friday, 26 May)
- Re: [sensors] Call 'onchange' on a Senor instance considering its own frequency hint Mikhail Pozdnyakov via GitHub (Friday, 26 May)
- Re: [sensors] Call 'onchange' on a Senor instance considering its own frequency hint Tobie Langel via GitHub (Friday, 26 May)
- Re: [sensors] Call 'onchange' on a Senor instance considering its own frequency hint Mikhail Pozdnyakov via GitHub (Friday, 26 May)
- Re: [sensors] Call 'onchange' on a Senor instance considering its own frequency hint Tobie Langel via GitHub (Friday, 26 May)
- Re: [sensors] Call 'onchange' on a Senor instance considering its own frequency hint Mikhail Pozdnyakov via GitHub (Friday, 26 May)
- Re: [sensors] Call 'onchange' on a Senor instance considering its own frequency hint Tobie Langel via GitHub (Friday, 26 May)
- Re: [sensors] Call 'onchange' on a Senor instance considering its own frequency hint Mikhail Pozdnyakov via GitHub (Friday, 26 May)
- Re: [sensors] Call 'onchange' on a Senor instance considering its own frequency hint Tobie Langel via GitHub (Friday, 26 May)
- Re: [sensors] Call 'onchange' on a Senor instance considering its own frequency hint Mikhail Pozdnyakov via GitHub (Monday, 29 May)
- Re: [sensors] Call 'onchange' on a Senor instance considering its own frequency hint Tobie Langel via GitHub (Monday, 29 May)
- Re: [sensors] Call 'onchange' on a Senor instance considering its own frequency hint Mikhail Pozdnyakov via GitHub (Monday, 29 May)
- Re: [sensors] Call 'onchange' on a Senor instance considering its own frequency hint Tobie Langel via GitHub (Monday, 29 May)
- Re: [sensors] Call 'onchange' on a Senor instance considering its own frequency hint Alexander Shalamov via GitHub (Monday, 29 May)
- Re: [sensors] Call 'onchange' on a Senor instance considering its own frequency hint Mikhail Pozdnyakov via GitHub (Monday, 29 May)
- Re: [sensors] Call 'onchange' on a Senor instance considering its own frequency hint Tobie Langel via GitHub (Monday, 29 May)
- Re: [sensors] Call 'onchange' on a Senor instance considering its own frequency hint Tobie Langel via GitHub (Monday, 29 May)
- Re: [sensors] Call 'onchange' on a Senor instance considering its own frequency hint Mikhail Pozdnyakov via GitHub (Monday, 29 May)
- Re: [sensors] Call 'onchange' on a Senor instance considering its own frequency hint Alexander Shalamov via GitHub (Monday, 29 May)
- Re: [sensors] Call 'onchange' on a Senor instance considering its own frequency hint Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub (Tuesday, 30 May)
- Re: [sensors] Add Input Elements to Mitigation Strategies Tobie Langel via GitHub (Wednesday, 3 May)
- Re: [sensors] Add Input Elements to Mitigation Strategies Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub (Thursday, 4 May)
- Re: [sensors] Add Input Elements to Mitigation Strategies Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub (Tuesday, 9 May)
- Re: [sensors] Add Input Elements to Mitigation Strategies Tobie Langel via GitHub (Tuesday, 9 May)
- Re: [sensors] Add Input Elements to Mitigation Strategies Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub (Monday, 15 May)
- Re: [sensors] Add Input Elements to Mitigation Strategies Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub (Monday, 15 May)
- Re: [sensors] Add Input Elements to Mitigation Strategies Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub (Monday, 15 May)
- Re: [sensors] Add Input Elements to Mitigation Strategies Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub (Monday, 15 May)
- Re: [sensors] Add Input Elements to Mitigation Strategies Tobie Langel via GitHub (Monday, 15 May)
- Re: [sensors] Add Input Elements to Mitigation Strategies Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub (Tuesday, 23 May)
Last message date: Wednesday, 31 May 2017 13:16:03 UTC