W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-device-apis-log@w3.org > May 2017

Re: [sensors] Define processing model

From: Tobie Langel via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 29 May 2017 11:48:57 +0000
To: public-device-apis-log@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-304642396-1496058535-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
We'll, we still don't really have clarity on (3): _won't these rapidly firing events interrupt rendering and cause jank as @slightlyoff suggests in ttps://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/115#issuecomment-236365671?_

I'd find it worthwhile to have a conversation about the benefit of having only a rAF-sync version in the main thread (maybe with no events at all) and evented stuff only in workers. Or maybe some different frequency caps depending on the context.

That said, the processing model is not currently linked to animation frames in the spec, and I don't intend to change that until we have consensus on how to move ahead with this.

I don't think we have consensus on this topic beyond a common understanding of the issues of the different solutions and the will to explore different options in order to find the ones that work the best.

GitHub Notification of comment by tobie
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/sensors/issues/198#issuecomment-304642396 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 29 May 2017 11:49:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 4 July 2022 12:47:54 UTC