W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-device-apis-log@w3.org > May 2017

[sensors] Should a "suspended" state be added

From: Tobie Langel via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 12:17:01 +0000
To: public-device-apis-log@w3.org
Message-ID: <issues.opened-232233574-1496146620-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
tobie has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/sensors:

== Should a "suspended" state be added ==
Sensors would be in this state when the security check would return "insecure".

Additionally, or alternatively, an "suspend" event could be fired in such cases.

Follow-up questions:

- What should the "activated" attribute getter return in such cases?
- Do we need a "state" or "status" attribute instead?
- Should an "activate" event be fired once the security check returns "secure" again?
- Etc., etc. 

Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/sensors/issues/223 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 30 May 2017 12:17:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 4 July 2022 12:47:54 UTC