> Can we find a better name for RawMagnetometer that almost everyone is happy with so that we can land this? It won't be perfect, I know, but such is life. It would first be good to hear the technical arguments for the different options (which are a different interface or a constructor option). > In the light of w3c/sensors#151 (comment) and #16 (comment) we should not expect a generic framework to emerge, and need to handle this on a case by case basis. Note this was about naming secondary attributes, not about API shape or interface name. *** I'd still like us to address https://github.com/w3c/magnetometer/pull/21#issuecomment-292472112 above before moving forward with this. -- GitHub Notification of comment by tobie Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/magnetometer/pull/21#issuecomment-300424907 using your GitHub accountReceived on Wednesday, 10 May 2017 09:18:31 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:34:23 UTC