Re: [sensors] Call 'onchange' on a Senor instance considering its own frequency hint

I not sure how you've read this from that comment, tbh.

What I've been trying to do is get everyone on the same page with making a distinction between option 2 and 3 (as so far this had been conflated, notably in the pull requests you made).

I agree that there are other options we could/should explore (such as splitting sensor and observer into two different objects as mentioned above).

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by tobie
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/sensors/issues/152#issuecomment-304630164 using your GitHub account

Received on Monday, 29 May 2017 10:34:54 UTC