W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-device-apis-log@w3.org > May 2017

Re: [sensors] Call 'onchange' on a Senor instance considering its own frequency hint

From: Tobie Langel via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 29 May 2017 10:34:47 +0000
To: public-device-apis-log@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-304630164-1496054086-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
I not sure how you've read this from that comment, tbh.

What I've been trying to do is get everyone on the same page with making a distinction between option 2 and 3 (as so far this had been conflated, notably in the pull requests you made).

I agree that there are other options we could/should explore (such as splitting sensor and observer into two different objects as mentioned above).

GitHub Notification of comment by tobie
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/sensors/issues/152#issuecomment-304630164 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 29 May 2017 10:34:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 4 July 2022 12:47:54 UTC