- From: Mikhail Pozdnyakov via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 29 May 2017 11:04:09 +0000
- To: public-device-apis-log@w3.org
> I not sure how you've read this from that comment, tbh. I treated "(1) none of the other behavior we agree we want to add depend on this, and (2) === was a requirement (see #8)." as a kind of stopper for option 3. If it was not the case, I'm happy to proceed with option 3. @alexshalamov I'd prefer `sensor1.reading != sensor2.reading` but than reading update and `onchange` events synchronized for each Sensor object. -- GitHub Notification of comment by pozdnyakov Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/sensors/issues/152#issuecomment-304634945 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 29 May 2017 11:04:15 UTC