- From: Alexander Shalamov via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 26 May 2017 17:17:33 +0000
- To: public-device-apis-log@w3.org
> Well, it's really not necessary for rAF sync'ed stuff, which instead is just going to get the values from the sensor attributes on each new frame. Sure, to clarify, I was talking about decoupling 'onchange' from rAF, time spent for 'onchange' event handlers invocation would take same time. > One rational proposal could have been to only allow rAF-synced sensors in the main window (maybe even without events?), and forced all other non-rAF, event-based sensor uses into workers. Sure, or we can research opt-in rAF sync, sort of exposing latest reading for rAF event handler (Anssi's proposal) -- GitHub Notification of comment by alexshalamov Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/sensors/issues/198#issuecomment-304339525 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 26 May 2017 17:17:39 UTC