W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-device-apis-log@w3.org > May 2017

Re: [sensors] Rewrite Abstract Operations

From: Tobie Langel via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 26 May 2017 09:10:29 +0000
To: public-device-apis-log@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-304232492-1495789827-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
> The #209 is not related to this issue

That's hard to say, actually, given how big the PR is.

> I don't see any technical objections related to decoupling onchange from rAF in #198

It's currently *not* coupled.

Ironically, the design proposed in this PR is one of the two possible designs I outline in #209. I do think this one is the right one to choose, but it would be nice to do so explicitly, rather than implicitly, hence my continuous push to edit this document once the issues a clear and there's consensus around them, i.e. as per W3C process, rather than in a pushy and rushed manner.

> I agree with Anssi that we need to research rAF synchronization as an opt-in feature.

Likewise.



-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by tobie
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/sensors/pull/197#issuecomment-304232492 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 26 May 2017 09:10:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 12:18:53 UTC