public-credentials@w3.org from February 2026 by author

Adam Sobieski

• Re: Blockchain Commons Known Values Registry: Compact Integer Identifiers for Ontological Concepts (Wednesday, 4 February)

Adrian Gropper

• Re: Ideal set of features and DID Methods? (Monday, 23 February)
• Re: Concern about AI-generated contributions in VCWG discussions (Sunday, 22 February)
• Re: Ideal set of features and DID Methods? (Friday, 20 February)
• Re: Concern about AI-generated contributions in VCWG discussions (Sunday, 15 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Sunday, 15 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Saturday, 14 February)
• Re: Concern about AI-generated contributions in VCWG discussions (Saturday, 14 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Friday, 13 February)

Amir Hameed

• Re: [PROPOSAL] Standardizing DID Key Recovery: Three Viable Architectures (Social, Temporal, and Distributed) (Monday, 23 February)
• [PROPOSAL] Standardizing DID Key Recovery: Three Viable Architectures (Social, Temporal, and Distributed) (Monday, 23 February)
• Re: Ideal set of features and DID Methods? (Saturday, 21 February)
• Re: Ideal set of features and DID Methods? (Saturday, 21 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Wednesday, 18 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Wednesday, 18 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Tuesday, 17 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Tuesday, 17 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Tuesday, 17 February)
• Re: Possible identity confusion in posts [was:Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation] (Tuesday, 17 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Monday, 16 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Monday, 16 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Monday, 16 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Monday, 16 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Monday, 16 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Monday, 16 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Monday, 16 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Monday, 16 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Monday, 16 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Monday, 16 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Monday, 16 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Monday, 16 February)
• Re: [Possible phishing attempt] Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Friday, 13 February)
• Re: Concern about AI-generated contributions in VCWG discussions (Friday, 13 February)
• Re: Introduction: Glogos - logic layer 0 for truth and coordination (Saturday, 24 January)
• Inquiry: Experiences with Pairwise DIDs (Monday, 9 February)
• Re: [Implementation] CRYSTALS-Dilithium5 in W3C Verifiable Credentials (Friday, 6 February)
• Re: [Implementation] CRYSTALS-Dilithium5 in W3C Verifiable Credentials (Friday, 6 February)
• Re: [Implementation] CRYSTALS-Dilithium5 in W3C Verifiable Credentials (Friday, 6 February)
• [Implementation] CRYSTALS-Dilithium5 in W3C Verifiable Credentials (Friday, 6 February)
• Re: [Email-to-DID Bridge] Exploring a practical migration path for email infrastructure (Tuesday, 3 February)
• Re: [Email-to-DID Bridge] Exploring a practical migration path for email infrastructure (Tuesday, 3 February)
• Re: [Email-to-DID Bridge] Exploring a practical migration path for email infrastructure (Tuesday, 3 February)
• Re: [Email-to-DID Bridge] Exploring a practical migration path for email infrastructure (Tuesday, 3 February)
• Re: [Email-to-DID Bridge] Exploring a practical migration path for email infrastructure (Tuesday, 3 February)
• Re: [Email-to-DID Bridge] Exploring a practical migration path for email infrastructure (Tuesday, 3 February)

Anders Rundgren

• Re: AW: The German Government slams JSON-LD (Friday, 27 February)
• Re: The German Government slams JSON-LD (Friday, 27 February)
• Re: AW: The German Government slams JSON-LD (Friday, 27 February)
• Re: The German Government slams JSON-LD (Friday, 27 February)
• The German Government slams JSON-LD (Friday, 27 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Saturday, 14 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Friday, 13 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Thursday, 12 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Thursday, 12 February)

Benjamin Young

• Re: AW: The German Government slams JSON-LD (Friday, 27 February)

Benjamin Young (W3C Calendar)

• Event Updated: CCG — Verifiable Issuers and Verifiers (Tuesday, 24 February)
• Event Invitation: CCG — Verifiable Issuers and Verifiers (Friday, 6 February)
• Event Updated: CCG — Verifiable Issuers and Verifiers (Friday, 6 February)

Boris Goranov

• RE: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Thursday, 12 February)

Brent Shambaugh

• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Thursday, 12 February)

carsten.stoecker@spherity.com

• AW: The German Government slams JSON-LD (Friday, 27 February)

Christoph

• Re: [Email-to-DID Bridge] Exploring a practical migration path for email infrastructure (Tuesday, 3 February)

Christopher Allen

• Re: Renaming the Verifiable Issuers/Verifiers spec (Wednesday, 25 February)
• Re: Ideal set of features and DID Methods? (Sunday, 22 February)
• Garner — Serve Identity Artifacts over Tor (Tuesday, 17 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Friday, 13 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Friday, 13 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Thursday, 12 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Thursday, 12 February)
• Blockchain Commons Known Values Registry: Compact Integer Identifiers for Ontological Concepts (Tuesday, 3 February)

Daniel Hardman

• Re: Concern about AI-generated contributions in VCWG discussions (Saturday, 14 February)

Daniel Ramos

• PM-KR Community Group Now Open - Major Updates & 103+ Cross-Disciplinary Connections (Monday, 23 February)

David Chadwick

• Re: Renaming the Verifiable Issuers/Verifiers spec (Wednesday, 25 February)
• Re: Renaming the Verifiable Issuers/Verifiers spec (Wednesday, 25 February)

Denken Chen

• Re: [MINUTES] CCG Atlantic Weekly 2026-02-03 (Monday, 9 February)

Drummond Reed

• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Tuesday, 17 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Thursday, 12 February)

ecsec GmbH

• Re: The German Government slams JSON-LD (Saturday, 28 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Thursday, 12 February)

Filip Kolarik

• Experimental did:cell Witness Service (open-source) (Friday, 27 February)
• Re: AW: The German Government slams JSON-LD (Friday, 27 February)
• Re: Ideal set of features and DID Methods? (Monday, 23 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Monday, 16 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Monday, 16 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Friday, 13 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Friday, 13 February)
• Re: Concern about AI-generated contributions in VCWG discussions (Friday, 13 February)
• Concern about AI-generated contributions in VCWG discussions (Friday, 13 February)
• Re: Blockchain Commons Known Values Registry: Compact Integer Identifiers for Ontological Concepts (Tuesday, 3 February)

Greg Bernstein

• Re: [Implementation] CRYSTALS-Dilithium5 in W3C Verifiable Credentials (Friday, 6 February)

Harrison

• Re: [Implementation] CRYSTALS-Dilithium5 in W3C Verifiable Credentials (Friday, 6 February)

Jasper van de Meent

• Implementation experience: intent-gated identity and provenance wrapper (did:jis + TIBET (Wednesday, 11 February)

Joe Andrieu

• Re: Ideal set of features and DID Methods? (Monday, 23 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Monday, 16 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Friday, 13 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Thursday, 12 February)

Jori Lehtinen

• Re: The German Government slams JSON-LD (Friday, 27 February)
• Re: The German Government slams JSON-LD (Friday, 27 February)
• Re: The German Government slams JSON-LD (Friday, 27 February)
• Re: The German Government slams JSON-LD (Friday, 27 February)
• Re: AW: The German Government slams JSON-LD (Friday, 27 February)
• Re: The German Government slams JSON-LD (Friday, 27 February)
• Re: Ideal set of features and DID Methods? (Friday, 20 February)
• Re: Ideal set of features and DID Methods? (Friday, 20 February)
• Re: Ideal set of features and DID Methods? (Friday, 20 February)
• Re: Ideal set of features and DID Methods? (Friday, 20 February)
• Re: Ideal set of features and DID Methods? (Friday, 20 February)
• Re: Ideal set of features and DID Methods? (Friday, 20 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Friday, 20 February)
• Re: Ideal set of features and DID Methods? (Friday, 20 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Monday, 16 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Monday, 16 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Monday, 16 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Monday, 16 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Monday, 16 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Monday, 16 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Monday, 16 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Monday, 16 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Monday, 16 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Monday, 16 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Monday, 16 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Monday, 16 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Monday, 16 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Monday, 16 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Monday, 16 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Monday, 16 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Monday, 16 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Monday, 16 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Monday, 16 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Monday, 16 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Monday, 16 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Monday, 16 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Monday, 16 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Monday, 16 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Monday, 16 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Monday, 16 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Monday, 16 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Monday, 16 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Sunday, 15 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Sunday, 15 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Sunday, 15 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Sunday, 15 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Sunday, 15 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Sunday, 15 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Sunday, 15 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Sunday, 15 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Saturday, 14 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Saturday, 14 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Saturday, 14 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Friday, 13 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Friday, 13 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Friday, 13 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Friday, 13 February)
• Re: [Possible phishing attempt] Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Friday, 13 February)
• Re: [Possible phishing attempt] Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Friday, 13 February)
• Re: [Possible phishing attempt] Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Friday, 13 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Friday, 13 February)
• Re: [Possible phishing attempt] Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Friday, 13 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Friday, 13 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Friday, 13 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Thursday, 12 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Thursday, 12 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Thursday, 12 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Thursday, 12 February)
• Brief on EUDI vs SEDI (Thursday, 12 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Thursday, 12 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Thursday, 12 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Thursday, 12 February)
• Re: [Implementation] CRYSTALS-Dilithium5 in W3C Verifiable Credentials (Friday, 6 February)
• Re: [Email-to-DID Bridge] Exploring a practical migration path for email infrastructure (Tuesday, 3 February)
• Re: Introduction: Glogos - logic layer 0 for truth and coordination (Tuesday, 3 February)
• Re: Introduction: Glogos - logic layer 0 for truth and coordination (Tuesday, 3 February)
• Re: Introduction: Glogos - logic layer 0 for truth and coordination (Sunday, 1 February)

Kyle Den Hartog

• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Sunday, 15 February)

Lars Kæraa Lücke

• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Friday, 13 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Friday, 13 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Friday, 13 February)

Lluís Alfons Ariño Martín

• Re: The German Government slams JSON-LD (Friday, 27 February)

Manu Sporny

• Re: The German Government slams JSON-LD (Friday, 27 February)
• Re: Renaming the Verifiable Issuers/Verifiers spec (Wednesday, 25 February)
• Re: Renaming the Verifiable Issuers/Verifiers spec (Wednesday, 25 February)
• Re: Renaming the Verifiable Issuers/Verifiers spec (Wednesday, 25 February)
• Re: Renaming the Verifiable Issuers/Verifiers spec (Wednesday, 25 February)
• Renaming the Verifiable Issuers/Verifiers spec (Wednesday, 25 February)
• Re: Ideal set of features and DID Methods? (Tuesday, 24 February)
• Re: [PROPOSAL] Standardizing DID Key Recovery: Three Viable Architectures (Social, Temporal, and Distributed) (Monday, 23 February)
• Re: Ideal set of features and DID Methods? (Monday, 23 February)
• Re: Ideal set of features and DID Methods? (Sunday, 22 February)
• Re: Ideal set of features and DID Methods? (Sunday, 22 February)
• Re: Concern about AI-generated contributions in VCWG discussions (Sunday, 22 February)
• Re: Ideal set of features and DID Methods? (Sunday, 22 February)
• Re: Ideal set of features and DID Methods? (Sunday, 22 February)
• Re: Ideal set of features and DID Methods? (Friday, 20 February)
• Re: Ideal set of features and DID Methods? (Friday, 20 February)
• Re: Ideal set of features and DID Methods? (Friday, 20 February)
• Re: Ideal set of features and DID Methods? (Friday, 20 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Sunday, 15 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Sunday, 15 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Sunday, 15 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Sunday, 15 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Saturday, 14 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Saturday, 14 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Saturday, 14 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Friday, 13 February)
• Re: [Possible phishing attempt] Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Friday, 13 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Friday, 13 February)
• Re: Concern about AI-generated contributions in VCWG discussions (Friday, 13 February)
• Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Wednesday, 11 February)
• Re: [Email-to-DID Bridge] Exploring a practical migration path for email infrastructure (Tuesday, 3 February)
• [VOTE] New Verifiable Credentials Charter (Sunday, 1 February)

Manu Sporny (W3C Calendar)

• Event Canceled: CCG — Data Integrity (Thursday, 12 February)

Markus Sabadello

• Re: The German Government slams JSON-LD (Friday, 27 February)

meetings@w3c-ccg.org

• [MINUTES] CCG Incubation 2026-02-24 (Wednesday, 25 February)
• [MINUTES] CCG VCALM 2026-02-24 (Wednesday, 25 February)
• [MINUTES] CCG Atlantic Weekly 2026-02-24 (Wednesday, 25 February)
• [MINUTES] VCs for Education 2026-02-23 (Monday, 23 February)
• [MINUTES] CCG Incubation 2026-02-17 (Tuesday, 17 February)
• [MINUTES] CCG VCALM 2026-02-17 (Tuesday, 17 February)
• [MINUTES] CCG Atlantic Weekly 2026-02-17 (Tuesday, 17 February)
• [MINUTES] CCG Incubation 2026-02-05 (Thursday, 5 February)
• [MINUTES] CCG VCALM 2026-02-03 (Wednesday, 4 February)
• [MINUTES] CCG Atlantic Weekly 2026-02-03 (Tuesday, 3 February)

Melvin Carvalho

• Re: The German Government slams JSON-LD (Friday, 27 February)
• Re: Ideal set of features and DID Methods? (Friday, 20 February)
• Re: Ideal set of features and DID Methods? (Friday, 20 February)
• Re: Concern about AI-generated contributions in VCWG discussions (Friday, 13 February)
• Re: Blockchain Commons Known Values Registry: Compact Integer Identifiers for Ontological Concepts (Tuesday, 3 February)

Michael Herman (Trusted Digital Web)

• RE: Ideal set of features and DID Methods? (Friday, 27 February)
• Re: Renaming the Verifiable Issuers/Verifiers spec (Wednesday, 25 February)
• RE: Ideal set of features and DID Methods? (Tuesday, 24 February)
• RE: Ideal set of features and DID Methods? (Monday, 23 February)
• RE: Ideal set of features and DID Methods? (Monday, 23 February)
• RE: Ideal set of features and DID Methods? (Monday, 23 February)
• RE: [PROPOSAL] Standardizing DID Key Recovery: Three Viable Architectures (Social, Temporal, and Distributed) (Monday, 23 February)
• Re: Ideal set of features and DID Methods? (Monday, 23 February)
• Re: Ideal set of features and DID Methods? (Sunday, 22 February)
• Re: Ideal set of features and DID Methods? (Sunday, 22 February)
• Re: Ideal set of features and DID Methods? (Sunday, 22 February)
• Re: Ideal set of features and DID Methods? (Sunday, 22 February)
• Re: Ideal set of features and DID Methods? (Saturday, 21 February)
• RE: Ideal set of features and DID Methods? (Saturday, 21 February)
• RE: Ideal set of features and DID Methods? (Saturday, 21 February)
• Re: Ideal set of features and DID Methods? (Saturday, 21 February)
• Re: Concern about AI-generated contributions in VCWG discussions (Monday, 16 February)
• RE: Concern about AI-generated contributions in VCWG discussions (Saturday, 14 February)
• RE: Concern about AI-generated contributions in VCWG discussions (Saturday, 14 February)

Moses Ma

• Re: Concern about AI-generated contributions in VCWG discussions (Friday, 20 February)
• Re: Concern about AI-generated contributions in VCWG discussions (Sunday, 15 February)
• Re: Concern about AI-generated contributions in VCWG discussions (Saturday, 14 February)

NIKOLAOS FOTIOY

• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Monday, 16 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Sunday, 15 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Sunday, 15 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Saturday, 14 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Friday, 13 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Friday, 13 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Friday, 13 February)

Patrick St-Louis (W3C Calendar)

• Event Updated: CCG — VCALM (Tuesday, 24 February)
• Event Updated: CCG — VCALM (Tuesday, 17 February)
• Event Updated: CCG — VCALM (Tuesday, 10 February)
• Event Updated: CCG — VCALM (Tuesday, 3 February)

Pierre Gronlier

• Re: AW: The German Government slams JSON-LD (Friday, 27 February)

Shigeya Suzuki

• Announcement: Another VC Software Stack now available: VCKnots (Thursday, 12 February)

Simone Onofri

• Re: Event Canceled: W3C CCG - Threat Modeling Credentials With LINDDUN (Saturday, 14 February)

Steffen Schwalm

• Re: The German Government slams JSON-LD (Saturday, 28 February)
• AW: The German Government slams JSON-LD (Saturday, 28 February)
• AW: AW: The German Government slams JSON-LD (Saturday, 28 February)
• Re: AW: The German Government slams JSON-LD (Friday, 27 February)
• Re: The German Government slams JSON-LD (Friday, 27 February)
• AW: The German Government slams JSON-LD (Friday, 27 February)
• AW: AW: The German Government slams JSON-LD (Friday, 27 February)
• AW: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Wednesday, 18 February)
• AW: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Tuesday, 17 February)
• AW: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Tuesday, 17 February)
• AW: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Monday, 16 February)
• AW: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Monday, 16 February)
• AW: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Monday, 16 February)
• AW: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Monday, 16 February)
• AW: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Monday, 16 February)
• AW: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Monday, 16 February)
• AW: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Monday, 16 February)
• AW: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Monday, 16 February)
• AW: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Monday, 16 February)
• AW: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Monday, 16 February)
• AW: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Monday, 16 February)
• AW: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Monday, 16 February)
• AW: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Monday, 16 February)
• AW: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Monday, 16 February)
• AW: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Monday, 16 February)
• AW: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Monday, 16 February)
• AW: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Monday, 16 February)
• AW: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Monday, 16 February)
• AW: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Monday, 16 February)
• AW: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Monday, 16 February)
• AW: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Monday, 16 February)
• AW: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Monday, 16 February)
• AW: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Monday, 16 February)
• AW: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Monday, 16 February)
• AW: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Monday, 16 February)
• AW: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Monday, 16 February)
• AW: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Monday, 16 February)
• AW: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Monday, 16 February)
• AW: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Sunday, 15 February)
• AW: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Sunday, 15 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Saturday, 14 February)
• AW: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Saturday, 14 February)
• AW: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Saturday, 14 February)
• AW: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Saturday, 14 February)
• AW: Brief on EUDI vs SEDI (Saturday, 14 February)
• AW: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Saturday, 14 February)
• AW: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Thursday, 12 February)
• AW: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Thursday, 12 February)
• AW: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Thursday, 12 February)
• AW: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Thursday, 12 February)

Stephen Curran

• Re: Renaming the Verifiable Issuers/Verifiers spec (Wednesday, 25 February)

Steve Capell

• Re: The German Government slams JSON-LD (Saturday, 28 February)
• Re: The German Government slams JSON-LD (Friday, 27 February)
• Re: The German Government slams JSON-LD (Friday, 27 February)
• Re: The German Government slams JSON-LD (Friday, 27 February)
• Re: Renaming the Verifiable Issuers/Verifiers spec (Wednesday, 25 February)
• Re: Ideal set of features and DID Methods? (Sunday, 22 February)
• Re: Ideal set of features and DID Methods? (Sunday, 22 February)
• Re: Ideal set of features and DID Methods? (Sunday, 22 February)
• Re: Ideal set of features and DID Methods? (Sunday, 22 February)
• Re: Ideal set of features and DID Methods? (Saturday, 21 February)
• Re: Ideal set of features and DID Methods? (Saturday, 21 February)
• Re: Ideal set of features and DID Methods? (Saturday, 21 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Monday, 16 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Monday, 16 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Monday, 16 February)

Steven Rowat

• Possible identity confusion in posts [was:Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation] (Monday, 16 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Monday, 16 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Sunday, 15 February)
• Re: Concern about AI-generated contributions in VCWG discussions (Sunday, 15 February)
• Re: Concern about AI-generated contributions in VCWG discussions (Saturday, 14 February)
• Re: Concern about AI-generated contributions in VCWG discussions (Friday, 13 February)

Thanh M. Le

• Re: Concern about AI-generated contributions in VCWG discussions (Sunday, 15 February)
• Re: Introduction: Glogos - logic layer 0 for truth and coordination (Tuesday, 3 February)
• Re: Introduction: Glogos - logic layer 0 for truth and coordination (Sunday, 1 February)

Venu R

• Re: [Possible phishing attempt] Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Friday, 13 February)
• Re: [Possible phishing attempt] Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Friday, 13 February)
• Re: [Possible phishing attempt] Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Friday, 13 February)
• Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation (Wednesday, 11 February)

W3C Webmaster via GitHub API

• Weekly github digest (Weekly update on Verifiable Credentials WG activity) (Monday, 23 February)
• Weekly github digest (Weekly update on Verifiable Credentials WG activity) (Monday, 16 February)
• Weekly github digest (Weekly update on Verifiable Credentials WG activity) (Monday, 9 February)
• Weekly github digest (Weekly update on Verifiable Credentials WG activity) (Monday, 2 February)

Will Abramson

• Fwd: Event Canceled: W3C CCG - Threat Modeling Credentials With LINDDUN (Monday, 9 February)
• Re: [Implementation] CRYSTALS-Dilithium5 in W3C Verifiable Credentials (Friday, 6 February)
• Re: [MINUTES] CCG Atlantic Weekly 2026-01-27 (Tuesday, 3 February)

Will Abramson (W3C Calendar)

• Event Canceled: W3C CCG - Threat Modeling Credentials With LINDDUN (Monday, 9 February)

陳信屹

• Re: [MINUTES] CCG Atlantic Weekly 2026-01-27 (Wednesday, 4 February)

Last message date: Saturday, 28 February 2026 12:09:54 UTC