Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation

On Fri, Feb 13, 2026 at 5:46 PM Adrian Gropper <agropper@healthurl.com> wrote:
> On the other hand, our community has almost completely avoided dealing with issues of holder binding, biometrics, and delegation while we swoon over cryptography and ZKPs.

Adrian, I know it's been a very long time since you've regularly
attended meetings, but you are (unknowingly) spreading misinformation.

Holder binding (which we've identified as a harmful term):

https://w3c.github.io/vc-confidence-method/#data-model
https://github.com/w3c/vc-confidence-method/issues/25

Biometrics:

https://github.com/w3c/vc-confidence-method/issues/14
https://github.com/w3c/vc-confidence-method/issues/17
https://github.com/w3c/vc-confidence-method/issues/21
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-vc-wg/2026Jan/0008.html

Delegation:

https://w3c-ccg.github.io/zcap-spec/

I know you're frustrated that we are not focusing on the things you
want us to focus on, when you want us to focus on them, but we have
made progress, are actively working on the things you are saying we're
not working on, and progress is being made. It's slower than any of us
would like, but it is not because we have "almost completely avoided
dealing with issues of holder binding, biometrics, and delegation".

I do admit that many of us tend to swoon over cryptography and ZKPs,
but that's mostly because they solve real problems for many of us
building solutions in multiple market verticals -- and because they're
good for society.

-- manu

-- 
Manu Sporny - https://www.linkedin.com/in/manusporny/
Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
https://www.digitalbazaar.com/

Received on Saturday, 14 February 2026 17:11:39 UTC