Re: Utah State-Endorsed Digital Identity (SEDI) legislation

> Blockchain is trust worthy because every node verifies and correct the
state before gossiping it forward including the node you control.

You can think of the blockchain as multiple (Q)TSP keeping each other
accountable, if one (Q)TSP tries to rewrite some trust items history the
others won't accept that change.

You combine them in to this one entity: Mega Qualified Trust Service
Provider ; )

And the trustworthiness in my example also comes from the blockchain only
the information required for the verification.

What needs to be presented to others as verifiable facts, are kept in
custody by the ones whose legal safety depends on being able to present
these to others as verifiable facts.

And also an example of legislation defining what needs to presented in
court  would be:

  “A legally binding digital signature SHALL be accompanied by
mathematically verifiable proof that the signature was generated using a
private key that is hosted only within the signer’s physical identity
instrument containing the signer’s personally identifiable data, and that
the identity instrument was active at the time of signing, such that the
signature MAY be verified at any later time using verification values
retrieved from the ‘Global Legal Trust Blockchain’.”