Re: Ideal set of features and DID Methods?

♥️

Jori Lehtinen reagoi Gmailin
<https://www.google.com/gmail/about/?utm_source=gmail-in-product&utm_medium=et&utm_campaign=emojireactionemail#app>
kautta

pe 20.2.2026 klo 17.59 Manu Sporny (msporny@digitalbazaar.com) kirjoitti:

> On Fri, Feb 20, 2026 at 10:34 AM Jori Lehtinen <lehtinenjori03@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > I interpreted what you tought I did as bad faith from me... Eg. I would
> have made a bad spec where I haven't tought things trough
>
> In an attempt to clear up that misunderstanding: I believe you are
> operating in good faith and have never doubted that. :)
>
> It is possible to operate in good faith, and still create a
> specification with flaws. In fact, most every specification comes into
> existence with deep flaws, and continues to be flawed until it becomes
> a global standard, and a fair number of specifications that are global
> standards continue to have flaws (most of them, IMHO).
>
> So, just because I think a specification you created has flaws, Jori,
> doesn't mean I think you're operating in bad faith. It means that I
> can see mistakes that the community has made in the past in the work
> that you have created and I'm letting you know that (because I want
> you to be successful). Bonus if you can convince some of us that what
> we thought was a flaw before is actually a feature, because then we
> learn something as a community.
>
> Hope that helps.
>
> -- manu
>
> --
> Manu Sporny - https://www.linkedin.com/in/manusporny/
> Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
> https://www.digitalbazaar.com/
>