- From: Jori Lehtinen <lehtinenjori03@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2026 00:48:45 +0200
- To: Steve Capell <steve.capell@gmail.com>
- Cc: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, Lluís Alfons Ariño Martín <lluisalfons.arino@urv.cat>, "carsten.stoecker@spherity.com" <carsten.stoecker@spherity.com>, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>, Rundgren Anders <anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com>, W3C Credentials CG <public-credentials@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAA6zkAu6urV_ZLDcNn33GHjBByyrqi+=VqyROwZo2PsCoZ+TdQ@mail.gmail.com>
>But The more important thing is that the 1000’s of regulations, conformity schemes, international conventions, etc, publish their “rulebooks” in a digitally referenceable way, not only as a big PDF containing 100’s of rules and stored at a url that could change any moment +1 la 28. helmik. 2026 klo 0.45 Steve Capell <steve.capell@gmail.com> kirjoitti: > I think the article conflates the idea of being clear about what you mean > with varying technology implementations. What EUDI calls rulebooks, UNTP > calls conformity vocabularies. See > https://untp.unece.org/docs/specification/ConformityVocabularyCatalog > (note - significant update to this page coming in a week or so). The key > thing to understand is that the semantic meaning challenge is not about the > little vocabulary that UNTP itself defines (properties of DPPs etc) but the > much larger set of regulations, standards, and conformity schemes that > exist and are the reference for product and facility performance claims and > assessments. These are not controlled by UNTP and collectively represent a > distributed vocabulary 1000 times the size of the core UNTP vocabulary. > > So the UNTP CVC is essentially a catalog of rulebooks together with a > standard way of publishing a rulebook. And this architecture would be > largely unchanged whether CVC scheme vocabularies and UNTP credentials that > reference them are JSON, JSON-LD, XML, or any other syntax. > > json-LD is a nice way to link meaning. But The more important thing is > that the 1000’s of regulations, conformity schemes, international > conventions, etc, publish their “rulebooks” in a digitally referenceable > way, not only as a big PDF containing 100’s of rules and stored at a url > that could change any moment > > So I think we should stop arguing about technical syntax and start > campaigning for authoritative meaning being anchored to stable URLs > > Steven Capell > UN/CEFACT Vice-Chair > Mob: +61 410 437854 > > > On 28 Feb 2026, at 1:02 am, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> > wrote: > > > > On Fri, Feb 27, 2026 at 8:34 AM Lluís Alfons Ariño Martín > > <lluisalfons.arino@urv.cat> wrote: > >> But it is wrong that SD-JWT VC provides unlinkability. Wrong that JSON > Schema can express what @context expresses. Wrong that @context is heavy > semantic-web processing inside wallets. Wrong that BBS has been killed by > regulation. And wrong that the choice is between JSON-LD inside credentials > and semantics in rulebooks - because @context is the bridge between the > two, not an alternative to either. > > > > Lluís, that was a masterful response! You hit all the right points and > > are, as far as I can tell, correct on all of them. Is there any chance > > you could publish your response online somewhere, we should boost your > > response as it effectively combats the misinformation. Same for your > > post, Carsten, can we get it at a permanent link? > > > > Carsten, thank you for pointing out that the EU, and even the "German > > government", do use the very technologies that SPRIN-D employees are > > arguing against. > > > > It is frustrating that we keep having to push back on this > > misinformation from SPRIN-D employees and OpenID Foundation members; > > it's been going on for a while now, and it's really getting out of > > hand. I continue to try to believe that it's not intentional, but the > > fact that we've communicated these exact points to both SPRIN-D and > > OpenID Foundation members multiple times over many years makes it > > difficult to keep the faith. > > > > The reality is that even though these "personal" blog posts and > > communication from SPRIN-D employees cannot represent the German > > government's views, they are absolutely being interpreted as such by > > other government personnel. I do participate in US government agency > > meetings and I can assure you that posts like the one that Lluís so > > eloquently dismantled are being interpreted as the German government, > > and the EU/EC's position. > > > > That will not change until folks within the EU start pushing back on > > the rhetoric, like Lluís and Carsten are doing, in a public way that > > the rest of us can point to as counter-arguments that are coming from > > within the EU. > > > > -- manu > > > > -- > > Manu Sporny - https://www.linkedin.com/in/manusporny/ > > Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. > > https://www.digitalbazaar.com/ > > > >
Received on Friday, 27 February 2026 22:48:59 UTC