- From: Stephen Curran <swcurran@cloudcompass.ca>
- Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2026 07:46:25 -0800
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Cc: Christopher Allen <ChristopherA@lifewithalacrity.com>, W3C Credentials CG <public-credentials@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAFLTOV6k1NPck5GE7VdzvgooPsyz+rZ2FB2inQG9=W7i0P+P0Q@mail.gmail.com>
+1 to Steve Capell's comment. I think that in addition (or where impractical, instead) of issuing a VC listing the registry entries, the registration authority should issue a VC to each registered entity that they could in turn publish. I think that should be within the scope of this effort. Taking that a step further (although outside of the scope of what I understand this specification covers) an entity with a DID could publish that credential they get from the registry authority in their *<did>/whois* Verifiable Presentation, for anyone to see. Given a DID, anyone can resolve "<did>/whois" to get verifiable data from "authorities" (whoever that might be) about that DID and the entity controlling it. This is a link to the did:webvh spec where the <did>/whois concept is described -- https://identity.foundation/didwebvh/v1.0/#the-whois-use-case. On Wed, Feb 25, 2026 at 7:34 AM Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 24, 2026 at 9:25 PM Christopher Allen > <ChristopherA@lifewithalacrity.com> wrote: > > What is the status of credentials/v2 schema that is used by these > examples? > > The v2 context shipped on May 15 2025 when the VCDM v2.0 spec shipped. > It's locked in place and will never change (the cryptographic hash for > that context is published in the VCDM v2.0 spec): > > https://www.w3.org/TR/vc-data-model-2.0/#base-context > > That said, you are correct that the example will need to be updated to > use a newer v2.1 (or later) context when we ship this particular > specification. We would also ship a "side car" context for those that > want to backport the feature into VCDM v1.0 or v2.0 VCs (though, we > expect the most common path is that developers will just upgrade to > the newest v2.1+ context). > > > Is this a deliverable of this group, or an existing schema? > > The contexts ship with the specs, so they are in scope... and > presuming the 2026 VCWG Charter is approved at the end of the week, > all of that will be in scope for the new VCWG. > > Did that answer your question adequately, Christopher? > > -- manu > > -- > Manu Sporny - https://www.linkedin.com/in/manusporny/ > Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. > https://www.digitalbazaar.com/ > > -- Stephen Curran Principal, Cloud Compass Computing, Inc.
Received on Wednesday, 25 February 2026 15:46:41 UTC