- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2026 10:59:05 -0500
- To: Jori Lehtinen <lehtinenjori03@gmail.com>
- Cc: W3C Credentials CG <public-credentials@w3.org>
On Fri, Feb 20, 2026 at 10:34 AM Jori Lehtinen <lehtinenjori03@gmail.com> wrote: > I interpreted what you tought I did as bad faith from me... Eg. I would have made a bad spec where I haven't tought things trough In an attempt to clear up that misunderstanding: I believe you are operating in good faith and have never doubted that. :) It is possible to operate in good faith, and still create a specification with flaws. In fact, most every specification comes into existence with deep flaws, and continues to be flawed until it becomes a global standard, and a fair number of specifications that are global standards continue to have flaws (most of them, IMHO). So, just because I think a specification you created has flaws, Jori, doesn't mean I think you're operating in bad faith. It means that I can see mistakes that the community has made in the past in the work that you have created and I'm letting you know that (because I want you to be successful). Bonus if you can convince some of us that what we thought was a flaw before is actually a feature, because then we learn something as a community. Hope that helps. -- manu -- Manu Sporny - https://www.linkedin.com/in/manusporny/ Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. https://www.digitalbazaar.com/
Received on Friday, 20 February 2026 15:59:45 UTC