public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org from May 2012: by thread

ACTION 15: target-pointer Yves Savourel (Thursday, 31 May)
ACTION-89: Draft cfp for localization world to PC list (MultilingualWeb-PC) Dr. David Filip (Thursday, 31 May)
- RE: ACTION-89: Draft cfp for localization world to PC list (MultilingualWeb-PC) Yves Savourel (Thursday, 31 May)
  - Re: ACTION-89: Draft cfp for localization world to PC list (MultilingualWeb-PC) Dr. David Filip (Thursday, 31 May)
[all] AGENDA MLW-LT WG, 31 May 2012 2 p.m. UTC Felix Sasaki (Wednesday, 30 May)
- Re: [all] AGENDA MLW-LT WG, 31 May 2012 2 p.m. UTC Arle Lommel (Thursday, 31 May)
Reminder: MLW-LT call 31 May 2 p.m. UTC Felix Sasaki (Tuesday, 29 May)
[ACTION-94]: go and find examples of concept ontology (semantic features of terms as opposed to domain type ontologies) Pedro L. Díez Orzas (Tuesday, 29 May)
- Re: [ACTION-94]: go and find examples of concept ontology (semantic features of terms as opposed to domain type ontologies) Tadej Stajner (Thursday, 31 May)
mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-23 (Moritz): Re-draft section 6.6. "Removal, Archiving and Re-integration of ITS mark-up" [MLW-LT Requirements Document] MultilingualWeb-LT Working Group Issue Tracker (Friday, 25 May)
[all] requirements draft published! Felix Sasaki (Thursday, 24 May)
[all] Working Group meeting, Thu 2012-05-24 14:00 UTC Dr. David Filip (Tuesday, 22 May)
[all] Requirements document, wiki etc. Felix Sasaki (Tuesday, 22 May)
ISSUE-11 (Delete genre, purpose and register data category proposals) and ACTION-87 (Summarize discussion about categories) Felix Sasaki (Friday, 18 May)
[all] tracker and public-multilingualweb-lt mailing list Felix Sasaki (Friday, 18 May)
[all] MLW-LT Call time: every week 2 p.m. UTC Felix Sasaki (Friday, 18 May)
[All] Call for consensus (Re: finished edits to requirements document) Felix Sasaki (Friday, 18 May)
- RE: [All] Call for consensus (Re: finished edits to requirements document) Jan Nelson (Friday, 18 May)
finished edits to requirements document Dave Lewis (Friday, 18 May)
Re: mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-7 (XPath Version): Sue of Xpath 2.0 [MLW-LT Standard Draft] Jirka Kosek (Thursday, 17 May)
- Re: mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-7 (XPath Version): Sue of Xpath 2.0 [MLW-LT Standard Draft] Jirka Kosek (Thursday, 24 May)
AUTO: CN=Phil Ritchie/O=VISTATEC is out of the office. (returning 21/05/2012) Phil Ritchie (Thursday, 17 May)
mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-22: Provenance and agents [MLW-LT Requirements Document] MultilingualWeb-LT Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 17 May)
ISSUE-2 (Fwd: Comment on RDF 1.1: use case for HTML5 data type) Felix Sasaki (Wednesday, 16 May)
mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-21 (cms-related-terminology): CMS related terminology: not only CMS as content [MLW-LT Requirements Document] MultilingualWeb-LT Working Group Issue Tracker (Wednesday, 16 May)
- Re: mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-21 (cms-related-terminology): CMS related terminology: not only CMS as content [MLW-LT Requirements Document] Dave Lewis (Thursday, 17 May)
  - Re: mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-21 (cms-related-terminology): CMS related terminology: not only CMS as content [MLW-LT Requirements Document] Felix Sasaki (Thursday, 17 May)
[all] Publication postponed - new schedule (Re: [all] call for consensus: publication of requirements as first public working draft) Felix Sasaki (Wednesday, 16 May)
- Re: [all] Publication postponed - new schedule (Re: [all] call for consensus: publication of requirements as first public working draft) Felix Sasaki (Wednesday, 16 May)
  - RE: [all] Publication postponed - new schedule (Re: [all] call for consensus: publication of requirements as first public working draft) Jan Nelson (Wednesday, 16 May)
[all] call for consensus: publication of requirements as first public working draft Felix Sasaki (Wednesday, 16 May)
- RE: [all] call for consensus: publication of requirements as first public working draft Yves Savourel (Wednesday, 16 May)
  - AW: [all] call for consensus: publication of requirements as first public working draft Moritz Hellwig (Wednesday, 16 May)
    - Re: AW: [all] call for consensus: publication of requirements as first public working draft Dave Lewis (Wednesday, 16 May)
    - Re: AW: [all] call for consensus: publication of requirements as first public working draft Felix Sasaki (Wednesday, 16 May)
    - AW: AW: [all] call for consensus: publication of requirements as first public working draft Moritz Hellwig (Wednesday, 16 May)
    - Re: AW: [all] call for consensus: publication of requirements as first public working draft Felix Sasaki (Wednesday, 16 May)
    - RE: AW: [all] call for consensus: publication of requirements as first public working draft Jan Nelson (Wednesday, 16 May)
    - Re: AW: [all] call for consensus: publication of requirements as first public working draft Declan Groves (Wednesday, 16 May)
    - Re: AW: [all] call for consensus: publication of requirements as first public working draft Tadej Stajner (Wednesday, 16 May)
[all] Agenda for WG meeting 14.00 UTC 17 May 2012 Dave Lewis (Tuesday, 15 May)
[ACTION-86] Put cache data category back to requirements Dave Lewis (Tuesday, 15 May)
- RE: [ACTION-86] Put cache data category back to requirements Pedro L. Díez Orzas (Wednesday, 16 May)
  - [ACTION-85] Provide example of cache data category Pedro L. Díez Orzas (Thursday, 17 May)
    - Re: [ACTION-85] Provide example of cache data category Felix Sasaki (Tuesday, 22 May)
    - RE: [ACTION-85] Provide example of cache data category Pedro L. Díez Orzas (Tuesday, 22 May)
[all] Working Group call time (please check again) Felix Sasaki (Monday, 14 May)
mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-20 (its-global-in-html5): Using ITS globally in HTML5 [MLW-LT Requirements Document] MultilingualWeb-LT Working Group Issue Tracker (Monday, 14 May)
- Re: mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-20 (its-global-in-html5): Using ITS globally in HTML5 [MLW-LT Requirements Document] Jirka Kosek (Monday, 14 May)
  - Re: mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-20 (its-global-in-html5): Using ITS globally in HTML5 [MLW-LT Requirements Document] Felix Sasaki (Monday, 14 May)
    - Re: mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-20 (its-global-in-html5): Using ITS globally in HTML5 [MLW-LT Requirements Document] Jirka Kosek (Monday, 14 May)
mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-19 (html-legacy-content): HTML legacy content: how to represent the metadata? [MLW-LT Requirements Document] MultilingualWeb-LT Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 10 May)
mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-18 (dropping-rdfa): Dropping RDFa as a requirement? MultilingualWeb-LT Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 10 May)
[all] handling of actions and issues - please check for missing issues before next call Felix Sasaki (Thursday, 10 May)
mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-17 (elements-or-attributes): Elements or attributes [MLW-LT Requirements Document] MultilingualWeb-LT Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 10 May)
mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-16 (parameter-for-rules): Parameter for rules [MLW-LT Requirements Document] MultilingualWeb-LT Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 10 May)
mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-15 (target-pointer): Definition of target pointer and why it is needed MultilingualWeb-LT Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 10 May)
- [ISSUE-15] target-pointer Yves Savourel (Friday, 11 May)
  - Re: [ISSUE-15] target-pointer Felix Sasaki (Friday, 11 May)
    - RE: [ISSUE-15] target-pointer Yves Savourel (Friday, 11 May)
  - Re: [ISSUE-15] target-pointer Shaun McCance (Friday, 11 May)
    - RE: [ISSUE-15] target-pointer Yves Savourel (Monday, 14 May)
    - RE: [ISSUE-15] target-pointer Shaun McCance (Monday, 14 May)
    - RE: [ISSUE-15] target-pointer Yves Savourel (Tuesday, 15 May)
mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-14 (process-trigger): Process trigger data category [MLW-LT Requirements Document] MultilingualWeb-LT Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 10 May)
mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-13 (cache): Cache data category needed and how? [MLW-LT Requirements Document] MultilingualWeb-LT Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 10 May)
[ACTION-80] consider consolidation of mtDisambiguationData, namedEntity, terminology and textAnalyticsAnnotation Tadej Stajner (Wednesday, 9 May)
- RE: [ACTION-80] consider consolidation of mtDisambiguationData, namedEntity, terminology and textAnalyticsAnnotation Thomas Ruedesheim (Thursday, 10 May)
  - Re: [ACTION-80] consider consolidation of mtDisambiguationData, namedEntity, terminology and textAnalyticsAnnotation Tadej Stajner (Thursday, 10 May)
AUTO: CN=Phil Ritchie/O=VISTATEC is out of the office. (returning 10/05/2012) Phil Ritchie (Wednesday, 9 May)
mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-12 (Segmentation Markup): Create a (Sentence) Segmentation Markup System compatible with the proposed Unicode segmentation characters [MLW-LT Requirements Document] MultilingualWeb-LT Working Group Issue Tracker (Wednesday, 9 May)
mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-11: Delete genre, purpose and register data category proposals [MLW-LT Requirements Document] MultilingualWeb-LT Working Group Issue Tracker (Wednesday, 9 May)
[All] new issue: propose to drop genre, purpose and register data category proposals Felix Sasaki (Wednesday, 9 May)
- Re: [All] new issue: propose to drop genre, purpose and register data category proposals Dr. David Filip (Wednesday, 9 May)
  - Re: [All] new issue: propose to drop genre, purpose and register data category proposals Declan Groves (Wednesday, 9 May)
    - Re: [All] new issue: propose to drop genre, purpose and register data category proposals Dr. David Filip (Wednesday, 9 May)
    - Re: [All] new issue: propose to drop genre, purpose and register data category proposals Felix Sasaki (Wednesday, 9 May)
    - Re: [All] new issue: propose to drop genre, purpose and register data category proposals Tadej Stajner (Wednesday, 9 May)
    - Re: [All] new issue: propose to drop genre, purpose and register data category proposals Georg Rehm (Wednesday, 9 May)
    - Re: [All] new issue: propose to drop genre, purpose and register data category proposals Georg Rehm (Wednesday, 9 May)
  - Re: [All] new issue: propose to drop genre, purpose and register data category proposals Dave Lewis (Wednesday, 9 May)
  - RE: [All] new issue: propose to drop genre, purpose and register data category proposals Milan Karasek (Thursday, 10 May)
mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-10 (lang-locale): Language versus locale [MLW-LT Requirements Document] MultilingualWeb-LT Working Group Issue Tracker (Wednesday, 9 May)
Language vs. locale Felix Sasaki (Wednesday, 9 May)
An additional data category Arle Lommel (Wednesday, 9 May)
- Re: An additional data category Dave Lewis (Wednesday, 9 May)
  - Re: An additional data category Felix Sasaki (Wednesday, 9 May)
[ACTION-81] consider consolidation of author, revisionAgent and translationAgent Dave Lewis (Tuesday, 8 May)
- Re: [ACTION-81] consider consolidation of author, revisionAgent and translationAgent Felix Sasaki (Wednesday, 9 May)
  - Re: [ACTION-81] consider consolidation of author, revisionAgent and translationAgent Dave Lewis (Thursday, 10 May)
Apologies (Re: [ACTION-75]: Post mandate between XLIFF TC and MLW-LT to public list) Felix Sasaki (Tuesday, 8 May)
[all] AGENDA MLW-LT call Thursday 2012-05-10 (ATTENTION: New call time + suggestion for general call time change) Felix Sasaki (Tuesday, 8 May)
- Re: [all] AGENDA MLW-LT call Thursday 2012-05-10 (ATTENTION: New call time + suggestion for general call time change) Dr. David Filip (Wednesday, 9 May)
  - Re: [all] AGENDA MLW-LT call Thursday 2012-05-10 (ATTENTION: New call time + suggestion for general call time change) Felix Sasaki (Thursday, 10 May)
[ACTION-82] Add an implementation commitment column to the table and ask people to populate it Dave Lewis (Tuesday, 8 May)
[All] Minutes MLW-LT call 2012-05-04 (DRAFT) Felix Sasaki (Friday, 4 May)
targetPointer Requirement update Yves Savourel (Friday, 4 May)
- Re: targetPointer Requirement update Dave Lewis (Friday, 4 May)
  - RE: targetPointer Requirement update Yves Savourel (Friday, 4 May)
    - Re: targetPointer Requirement update Felix Sasaki (Monday, 7 May)
    - Re: targetPointer Requirement update Arle Lommel (Monday, 7 May)
    - Re: targetPointer Requirement update David Lewis (Monday, 7 May)
    - RE: targetPointer Requirement update Yves Savourel (Monday, 7 May)
    - Re: targetPointer Requirement update David Lewis (Tuesday, 8 May)
    - RE: targetPointer Requirement update Yves Savourel (Tuesday, 8 May)
    - Re: targetPointer Requirement update Felix Sasaki (Tuesday, 8 May)
    - Re: targetPointer Requirement update Dave Lewis (Tuesday, 8 May)
    - Re: targetPointer Requirement update Felix Sasaki (Tuesday, 8 May)
    - Re: targetPointer Requirement update Dave Lewis (Tuesday, 8 May)
    - Re: targetPointer Requirement update Felix Sasaki (Wednesday, 9 May)
    - Re: targetPointer Requirement update Chase Tingley (Monday, 7 May)
- Re: targetPointer Requirement update Arle Lommel (Friday, 4 May)
  - RE: targetPointer Requirement update Yves Savourel (Sunday, 6 May)
- Re: targetPointer Requirement update Shaun McCance (Wednesday, 9 May)
  - RE: targetPointer Requirement update Yves Savourel (Wednesday, 9 May)
    - RE: targetPointer Requirement update Shaun McCance (Wednesday, 9 May)
    - RE: targetPointer Requirement update Yves Savourel (Wednesday, 9 May)
    - Re: targetPointer Requirement update Dave Lewis (Wednesday, 9 May)
Re: [ACTION-79]Consider consolidation of status-related data categories and process trigger David Lewis (Friday, 4 May)
- Re: [ACTION-79]Consider consolidation of status-related data categories and process trigger David Lewis (Monday, 7 May)
  - RE: [ACTION-79]Consider consolidation of status-related data categories and process trigger Pedro L. Díez Orzas (Monday, 7 May)
    - Re: [ACTION-79]Consider consolidation of status-related data categories and process trigger David Lewis (Tuesday, 8 May)
    - RE: [ACTION-79]Consider consolidation of status-related data categories and process trigger Pedro L. Díez Orzas (Tuesday, 8 May)
    - Re: [ACTION-79]Consider consolidation of status-related data categories and process trigger Felix Sasaki (Wednesday, 9 May)
    - Re: [ACTION-79]Consider consolidation of status-related data categories and process trigger Arle Lommel (Wednesday, 9 May)
    - RE: [ACTION-79]Consider consolidation of status-related data categories and process trigger Pedro L. Díez Orzas (Wednesday, 9 May)
    - Re: [ACTION-79]Consider consolidation of status-related data categories and process trigger Felix Sasaki (Wednesday, 9 May)
    - Re: [ACTION-79]Consider consolidation of status-related data categories and process trigger Dave Lewis (Thursday, 10 May)
    - RE: [ACTION-79]Consider consolidation of status-related data categories and process trigger Pedro L. Díez Orzas (Wednesday, 16 May)
- AW: [ACTION-79]Consider consolidation of status-related data categories and process trigger Moritz Hellwig (Wednesday, 9 May)
Re: [all] suggestions for consolidating requirements David Lewis (Friday, 4 May)
[ACTION-87] Produce initial table which takes data cats and ranks by difficulty based on current allocations and rank by interest of WG members David Lewis (Friday, 4 May)
[ACTION-75]: Post mandate between XLIFF TC and MLW-LT to public list Dr. David Filip (Thursday, 3 May)
- Re: [ACTION-75]: Post mandate between XLIFF TC and MLW-LT to public list Pål Eivind J Nes (Thursday, 3 May)
- Re: [ACTION-75]: Post mandate between XLIFF TC and MLW-LT to public list Felix Sasaki (Thursday, 3 May)
  - Re: [ACTION-75]: Post mandate between XLIFF TC and MLW-LT to public list Dr. David Filip (Thursday, 3 May)
    - Re: [ACTION-75]: Post mandate between XLIFF TC and MLW-LT to public list Felix Sasaki (Friday, 4 May)
[all] Working Group Meeting details and agenda - May 4, 10am GMT DST Dr. David Filip (Thursday, 3 May)
Re: [ACTION-78]Consider consolidation of localeSpecificContent and droprule David Lewis (Wednesday, 2 May)
mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-9 (id value rules): id granularity and maintenance requirements and rules MultilingualWeb-LT Working Group Issue Tracker (Wednesday, 2 May)
mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-8 (id value rules): id granularity and maintenance requirements and rules MultilingualWeb-LT Working Group Issue Tracker (Wednesday, 2 May)
Re: [issue 3] How to specify the entity type with RDFa ? Maxime Lefrançois (Wednesday, 2 May)
ACTION-74: Check ITS 1.0 future work is included in the req document David Lewis (Tuesday, 1 May)
- RE: ACTION-74: Check ITS 1.0 future work is included in the req document Yves Savourel (Wednesday, 2 May)
Re: XPath Version Felix Sasaki (Tuesday, 1 May)
- RE: XPath Version Yves Savourel (Tuesday, 1 May)
  - RE: XPath Version Jan Nelson (Tuesday, 1 May)
  - Re: XPath Version Jirka Kosek (Tuesday, 1 May)
- Re: XPath Version Jirka Kosek (Tuesday, 1 May)
  - Re: XPath Version Shaun McCance (Tuesday, 1 May)
    - Re: XPath Version Jirka Kosek (Wednesday, 2 May)
    - Re: XPath Version Pål Eivind J Nes (Thursday, 3 May)
    - Re: XPath Version Shaun McCance (Friday, 4 May)
    - Re: XPath Version Jirka Kosek (Friday, 4 May)
RE: Missing requirment - content format/type Yves Savourel (Tuesday, 1 May)
- Re: Missing requirment - content format/type Arle Lommel (Tuesday, 1 May)
  - Re: Missing requirment - content format/type David Lewis (Tuesday, 1 May)
Re: idValue requirement updated David Lewis (Tuesday, 1 May)
- RE: idValue requirement updated Yves Savourel (Tuesday, 1 May)
- Re: idValue requirement updated Shaun McCance (Tuesday, 1 May)
  - RE: idValue requirement updated Yves Savourel (Tuesday, 1 May)
    - Re: idValue requirement updated David Lewis (Tuesday, 1 May)
    - RE: idValue requirement updated Yves Savourel (Wednesday, 2 May)
    - Re: idValue requirement updated David Lewis (Wednesday, 2 May)
- Re: idValue requirement updated Jirka Kosek (Wednesday, 2 May)
Re: Let's drop RDFa in the requirements ! David Lewis (Tuesday, 1 May)
- Re: Let's drop RDFa in the requirements ! Maxime Lefrançois (Wednesday, 2 May)
  - Re: Let's drop RDFa in the requirements ! Felix Sasaki (Wednesday, 2 May)
    - Re: Let's drop RDFa in the requirements ! Maxime Lefrançois (Wednesday, 2 May)
    - Re: Let's drop RDFa in the requirements ! Felix Sasaki (Wednesday, 2 May)
    - Re: Let's drop RDFa in the requirements ! Tadej Stajner (Wednesday, 2 May)
  - Re: Let's drop RDFa in the requirements ! Dave Lewis (Tuesday, 8 May)
    - NLP Interchange Format was: Re: Let's drop RDFa in the requirements ! Sebastian Hellmann (Thursday, 10 May)
    - Re: NLP Interchange Format was: Re: Let's drop RDFa in the requirements ! Felix Sasaki (Friday, 11 May)
    - Re: NLP Interchange Format was: Re: Let's drop RDFa in the requirements ! Sebastian Hellmann (Friday, 11 May)
    - Re: NLP Interchange Format was: Re: Let's drop RDFa in the requirements ! Tadej Stajner (Friday, 11 May)

public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org from May 2012 by thread