Re: AW: [all] call for consensus: publication of requirements as first public working draft

Hi Moritz,

this has nothing to do with the W3C process :)

It's the main conference in the language resources and language technology
area, see
http://www.lrec-conf.org/lrec2012/
Dave, I and others had hoped to publish the draft before LREC, that is
before or early next week.

Felix

2012/5/16 Moritz Hellwig <Moritz.Hellwig@cocomore.com>

> Hello Felix,****
>
> ** **
>
> currently trying to understand the W3C and its processes better, so I’ve
> got a question: what’s LREC?****
>
> ** **
>
> Cheers,****
>
> Moritz****
>
> ** **
>
> *Von:* Felix Sasaki [mailto:fsasaki@w3.org]
> *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 16. Mai 2012 16:38
> *An:* Dave Lewis
> *Cc:* public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org
> *Betreff:* Re: AW: [all] call for consensus: publication of requirements
> as first public working draft****
>
> ** **
>
> Hi Dave,****
>
> ** **
>
> the bottom line is that I need to freeze the document tonight, 11 p.m., or
> we won't be able to publish this before LREC. Some questions / comments
> below?****
>
> 2012/5/16 Dave Lewis <dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie>****
>
> Hi Felix,
> I had a quick scan last night. In general I think it looks good with the
> proviso of:
> 1) there are some ongoing actions with data category proposals from yves,
> tadaj, myself and others circulating via the list that are not yet in the
> document. But if they are still being discussed then we can leave them out
> for this version.****
>
> ** **
>
> You mean "leave the data categories out"? I would propose to have them in,
> since it can help to foster our discussions.****
>
>  ****
>
> 2) should we remove the interested person names from the data category
> table, and just record them on the separate assessment page.****
>
> ** **
>
> Agree.****
>
>  ****
>
> 3) you mention moving the end-to-end use case into section 2 - which would
> improve the flow The text could do with some improvement to communicate the
> use cases in a more accessible way, and to be more consistent with the
> prior definitions.****
>
> ** **
>
> Agree. ****
>
>  ****
>
> 4) There are several direct links to other documents in the text, should
> these be put in as references?****
>
> ** **
>
> Yes.****
>
>  ****
>
>
> If you can signal when you have done your changes, i can try and address
> these on the wiki version say on thursday evening before the HTML
> conversion. When do you need it frozen to do the HTML step?****
>
> ** **
>
> Today 11 p.m., if we want to publish before LREC.****
>
> ** **
>
> Felix****
>
>  ****
>
>
> cheers,
> Dave****
>
>
>
>
>
> On 16/05/2012 13:43, Moritz Hellwig wrote: ****
>
> Hi Felix,****
>
>  ****
>
> for the first draft, this looks fine too me too. ****
>
>  ****
>
> I’ve attached a diagram of the proposed metadata to this message, as I
> find it easier to get an overview over what’s been proposed. I plan to
> extend it regularly when things change or more information becomes
> available the metadata. I’d like to add the diagram to the requirements
> page if nobody has any objections.****
>
>
> Cheers,****
>
> Moritz****
>
>  ****
>
> *Von:* Yves Savourel [mailto:ysavourel@enlaso.com <ysavourel@enlaso.com>]
> *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 16. Mai 2012 13:44
> *An:* 'Felix Sasaki'; public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org
> *Betreff:* RE: [all] call for consensus: publication of requirements as
> first public working draft****
>
>  ****
>
> Hi Felix,****
>
>  ****
>
> The current wiki draft looks fine to me for a first draft.****
>
>  ****
>
> Cheers,****
>
> -yves****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
> *From:* Felix Sasaki [mailto:fsasaki@w3.org]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 15, 2012 11:20 PM
> *To:* public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org
> *Subject:* [all] call for consensus: publication of requirements as first
> public working draft****
>
>  ****
>
> All,****
>
>  ****
>
> this is call for consensus for publishing the requirements document ****
>
> http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/wiki/Requirements****
>
> as a first public working draft. For those of you who are new to the W3C
> process: we need a decision by the working group to publish the draft under
> the "TR" directory****
>
> http://www.w3.org/TR/****
>
>  ****
>
> this evening (European time) I will do the following:****
>
> - Implement issue-10 in the draft ****
>
> https://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/track/issues/10****
>
> - generalize all comments like "ARLE: ..." to "working group comment: ..."
> ****
>
> - add a "status of the document" section at the top of the document****
>
> - convert the document to HTML and send the so-called "transition request".
> ****
>
>  ****
>
> Please reply to this call for consensus if you have any concerns about the
> publication. Of course the document still has issues. Note that the
> publication will be a *first* public working draft, so we will have plenty
> of opportunities to change things. Note also that publishing asap is
> helpful for getting wider feedback, e.g. next week at the LREC conference
> which some of us will attend. So if there are no very severe issues, I
> encourage you to agree with the publication.****
>
>  ****
>
> Please give any feedback in this thread by tonight 11 p.m. CEST.****
>
>  ****
>
> Thanks,****
>
>  ****
>
> Felix****
>
>  ****
>
> --
> Felix Sasaki****
>
> DFKI / W3C Fellow****
>
>  ****
>
> ** **
>
>
>
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> --
> Felix Sasaki****
>
> DFKI / W3C Fellow****
>
> ** **
>



-- 
Felix Sasaki
DFKI / W3C Fellow