!! in section 1.2 of XSD 1.1: Structures
[Bug 1836] RQ-100 define canonical form for language type, update RFC reference
[Bug 1843] RQ-141b: Editing intro paragraphs of Datatypes Sec 2 (Requirement)
[Bug 1852] RQ-141b -- Changes to Part 2 to align with Part 1 (Requirement)
[Bug 1853] RQ-141b define and use "ancestor" in mapping rules for simple type defns (Requirement)
[Bug 1902] RQ21: BNF, regex, etc for string
[Bug 1903] RQ21: BNF, regex, etc for boolean
[Bug 1907] RQ21: BNF, regex, etc for float and double
[Bug 1912] RQ-31e: remove lexicalMappings facet
[Bug 1913] RQ-120: use the term 'derived' consistently (Structures) (Desideratum)
[Bug 1917] RQ-140: distinguish negative from positive zero in float and double (Requirement)
[Bug 1918] RQ-150b: set minimum implementation reqs for decimal (Requirement)
[Bug 1919] RQ-150c: set minimum implementation reqs for precisionDecimal (Requirement)
[Bug 1925] EP-01: clarify complex property values and component classes (Datatypes)
[Bug 1926] EP-14: define 'literal' and use it more consistently
[Bug 1929] RQ-141e: Make pattern value be a set of regexes, not one regex
[Bug 2044] R-198: ensure that unions of unions retain union-level facets
[Bug 2069] R-079: Ambiguity in statements about valid type derivation
[Bug 2082] R-092: Clarification required for group redefinition
[Bug 2162] R-165: Clarification requested for statement in Appendix H of Structures
[Bug 2195] R-202: How many components are there for complextype extensions?
[Bug 2218] R-226: Must the content of schemaLocation be a resolvable URL?
[Bug 2309] Clarify identity of values across related simple types
[Bug 2311] Point out the cases where attribute prohibitions are pointless
[Bug 2337] Add {context} property to simple type definition in Datatypes
[Bug 2439] ChecK new RFC 3066 bis
[Bug 2576] Clarify relation of language type to xml:lang
[Bug 2658] lc-1 : rfc2396bis
[Bug 2660] lc-3: QA review of XML Schema: Component Designators
[Bug 2662] lc-5: Rule out default namespace
[Bug 2753] wd-27: Errors in component diagram
[Bug 2811] align use of 'atomic' with part 2
[Bug 2824] RQ-151 Define schema composition (composition)
[Bug 2828] RQ-155 State prohibition of use attribute on top-level attributes more clearly (topleveluse)
[Bug 2842] RQ-134 Origin of inherited portions of content model (scd-origin-inheritance)
[Bug 2947] Datatypes 2006-02-17 WD: what makes an order trivial?
[Bug 3079] RFC3066 ref
[Bug 3220] Terminology: "must"
[Bug 3224] Inequality
[Bug 3228] Lists|Unions of Lists|Unions
[Bug 3230] Atomic = not decomposable?
[Bug 3232] Type versus Datatype
[Bug 3237] Relationship to programming language types
[Bug 3244] Sets of lists
[Bug 3249] Constants
[Bug 3251] how to introduce primitives
[Bug 3251] need for precisionDecimal / how to introduce primitives
[Bug 3256] BC dates
[Bug 3265] Length facet for QNames
[Bug 3266] "Current schema"
[Bug 3589] Definitions of "schema document" draft proposal for bugs 2822 and 2846 PSVI and processor profiles
[Bug 3677] [SCD] Numeric predicates confusing
[Bug 3681] [SCD] missing component::* from BNF
[Bug 3682] [SCD] ModelGroupStep production error
[Bug 3683] [SCD] Allow for ./ in paths
[Bug 3684] [SCD] // confusing
[Bug 3685] [SCD] (Editorial) Origanize by axes
[Bug 3724] Rule "Content type restricts" needs clarification
[Bug 3840] Mistaken id in appendix C.1: string.preserve
[Bug 3855] Use of "Default Axis" versus XPath
[Bug 3869] Annotation mapping for simple type and facets
[Bug 3889] 3.3.1 incorrect use of "respectively" (editorial)
[Bug 3891] 3.14.6 wording - missing/unclear antecedent
[Bug 3892] 3.4.1 ambiguous/erroneous wording - prohib. subst. relation to elem. decl.
[Bug 3950] {fixed} is redundant for length
[Bug 3963] Editorial work on "Attribute Locally Valid (Use)"
[Bug 4033] "(constraining) facets" section missing for "date"
[Bug 4089] Some RFCs in "normative references" are not used
[Bug 4202] Add a note to clarify validity of partial "unique" values
[Bug 4276] Namespace Constraint Property Record problems
[Bug 4280] Add example(s) to show how idc references work
[Bug 4336] Another occurrence of nested modals
[Bug 4368] Editorial: what does "the appropriate case ... is true" mean?
[Bug 4398] XML declaration appears after DocType in appendix A
[Bug 4449] How do you write an empty namespace prefix?
[Bug 4470] Editorial work in "Attribute Locally Valid (Use)"
[Bug 4518] inaccurate description of PSVI in 3.16.5
[Bug 4764] delete words appropriate for leap-seconds
[Bug 4839] Bug in anchor for documentation of hexBinary type
[Bug 4850] Update of reference for language data type
[Bug 4900] typo in 4.3.1.4 (need quantifier)
[Bug 4912] Allow empty unions
[Bug 4986] typo in "3.4.3 language" Note
[Bug 5003] Applicability of <alternative> element to xml:lang
- bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Tuesday, 19 February)
- bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Monday, 4 February)
- bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Monday, 4 February)
- bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Monday, 4 February)
- bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 24 January)
- bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Wednesday, 23 January)
- bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Tuesday, 22 January)
- bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Monday, 21 January)
- bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Monday, 21 January)
- bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Saturday, 19 January)
- bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Friday, 18 January)
- bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Friday, 18 January)
- bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 17 January)
- bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 17 January)
- bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Tuesday, 15 January)
- bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Tuesday, 15 January)
- bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Tuesday, 15 January)
- bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Monday, 14 January)
- bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Monday, 14 January)
[Bug 5004] 2007-08-30 WD: inconsistency between type keybase of S4S and Section 3.11.3 (icd representation)
[Bug 5023] Relationship between identity constraints and assertions
[Bug 5029] Editorial: repeated word
[Bug 5030] Assertions on simple types
[Bug 5052] S4S: unresolved type for attributes test declared within "assertion" and "altType"
[Bug 5053] S4S: Issues on the complex type definition "altType"
[Bug 5059] XDM should be referenced normatively
[Bug 5062] what facets apply to union?
[Bug 5072] minor editorial issues
[Bug 5074] substitution groups not that strictly limited
[Bug 5075] use of "ad" as an ID vs. ad blockers
[Bug 5076] Comparator modification not apparent
[Bug 5077] Use of "le" in assertion test
[Bug 5078] define required components
[Bug 5079] Type tables and substitution groups
[Bug 5126] Assertions: usability
[Bug 5127] Missing NOTATION component
[Bug 5137] small editorial changes sections 0-2
[Bug 5139] small editorial changes sections 3.0-3.2
[Bug 5141] small editorial changes section 3.4-3.6
[Bug 5142] small editorial changes section 3.8.4
[Bug 5144] small editorial changes section 3.8.6-3.15.1
[Bug 5145] small editorial changes section 4.2.4-5.2
[Bug 5146] small editorial changes missing blanks multiple sections
[Bug 5149] normative format rfc2119 keywords used in non-normative notes
[Bug 5150] unclear if some prose is normative or non-normative
[Bug 5151] pseudo-normative qualifications used in apparently normative contexts
[Bug 5152] tableau presentation difficult to understand
[Bug 5153] 3.2.2 XML Representation of Attribute Declaration Schema Components
[Bug 5155] 3.3.2 XML Representation of Element Declaration Schema Components
[Bug 5156] 3.4.2 XML Representation of Complex Type Definitions
[Bug 5157] 3.4.2 example unclear
[Bug 5158] discuss general name/ref pattern up front
[Bug 5160] all group info in odd place
[Bug 5161] all model group min/maxoccurs confusing
[Bug 5162] wildcard notQname=defined
[Bug 5163] schemalocation needs to be cleaned up and clarified
[Bug 5164] validation vs assessment
[Bug 5165] Editorial: numbering of rules and constraints
[Bug 5167] misc editorial
[Bug 5168] vc:maxVersion versioning
[Bug 5192] Terminology: "absent" (editorial)
[Bug 5193] Validation Rule: Element Locally Valid (Complex Type)
[Bug 5194] Editorial comments on section 3.4.2
[Bug 5195] Editorial comments on section 3.4.4
[Bug 5200] Not ##defined. Use ##definedSibling
[Bug 5229] Definition of xs:double
[Bug 5231] name xpath subset used in identity constraint selectors
[Bug 5238] Resolution to bug 2850 needs additional example - key/keyref
[Bug 5244] Move co-constraints into types
[Bug 5258] Garbled text (? or other problem?) in Str 3.5.4 Attribute locally valid (use)
[Bug 5262] Incorrect link to S4SD
[Bug 5263] Errors in the S4SD
[Bug 5265] Interchangeable use of "xs" and "xsd" prefixes
[Bug 5266] XSDL?
[Bug 5273] xpathDefaultNamespace on identity constraints
[Bug 5274] Nomenclature: defaultXPathDefaultNamespace
[Bug 5276] targetNamespace defined on xs:element
[Bug 5281] Why allow an element to be valid against a declaration with the wrong name?
[Bug 5282] UPA and overlapping substitution groups
[Bug 5286] Component constraints within XML representation constraints
[Bug 5289] "##defined" in wildcards
[Bug 5293] Subsumption
[Bug 5296] An oddity with substitution groups
[Bug 5297] Drop restriction of assertions to down-pointing XPaths?
[Bug 5320] [SCD] Rename element:: and attribute:: axes
[Bug 5321] REs are not production nonterminals
[Bug 5322] Nonterminal "Char" has two productions
[Bug 5345] Split SCC: Derivation Valid (Extension) into 2 parts
[Bug 5353] Do "path" etc. apply to model groups or particles or content models?
[Bug 5371] [SCD] Eliminate notion of 'elided steps'
[Bug 5372] Define bridge functions
[Bug 5373] [SCD] Define accessors
[Bug 5374] [SCD] Crisp identity conditions
[Bug 5375] [SCD] Regularize the grammar
[Bug 5376] [SCD] Richer extension story
[Bug 5377] Requirement for metadata querying
[Bug 5378] [SCD] XML representation of schema components
[Bug 5396] What EBNF is used?
[Bug 5412] Is lax assessment required after "missing sub-component"?
[Bug 5425] Revise Composition
[Bug 5426] Revisit whether or allow partial XPath implementation
[Bug 5427] Primer materials within the Structures Rec
[Bug 5431] Normal characters, character references
[Bug 5435] The term "valid schema" is used but not defined
[Bug 5436] Editorial: replace 'attributed to' with 'bound to' ?
[Bug 5465] Bug in anchor for documentation of hexBinary type
[Bug 5466] Point out the cases where attribute prohibitions are pointless
[Bug 5467] 3.3.1 incorrect use of "respectively" (editorial)
[Bug 5468] 3.14.6 wording - missing/unclear antecedent
[Bug 5469] substitution groups not that strictly limited
[Bug 5470] 3.4.1 ambiguous/erroneous wording - prohib. subst. relation to elem. decl.
[Bug 5476] xsi:schemaLocation should be a hint, should be MAY not SHOULD
[Bug 5486] Regex: Names of Unicode code blocks
[Bug 5487] Special status of namespaces xs, xsi, xml etc
[Bug 5504] Annotations can vary in an extension? Why?
[Bug 5507] Symbol spaces need clearer description
[Bug 5512] Definition of valid schema document is incomplete
[Bug 5535] Definition of [nil] is wrong
[Bug 5549] datatypes not ·ordered·, but ordered {value} is partial
[Bug 5550] references to fundamental facets
Make more use of {base type definition}
possible bug in XML Schema 1.1 Part 2: Datatypes (was Re: question about lexical and value spaces)
question about lexical and value spaces
- Dave Peterson (Friday, 18 January)
- Michael Kay (Friday, 18 January)
- noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com (Friday, 18 January)
- Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Thursday, 10 January)
- Michael Kay (Thursday, 10 January)
- Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Thursday, 10 January)
- Dave Peterson (Wednesday, 9 January)
- Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Wednesday, 9 January)
- Michael Kay (Wednesday, 9 January)
- Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Wednesday, 9 January)
Question on <openContent> and <anyAttribute>
W3C SML and SML-IF 1.1 Last Call
Last message date: Tuesday, 25 March 2008 13:43:26 UTC