- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 00:04:39 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5062 cmsmcq@w3.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|major |minor Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Priority|P2 |P3 ------- Comment #4 from cmsmcq@w3.org 2008-03-09 00:04 ------- The minutes of the XML Schema WG call of 2 November 2007 (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2007Nov/0010.html) [member-only link] show that the WG concluded that while the original intention was, or may have been, to allow upper- and lower-bounds facets on totally ordered unions (i.e. with all members from the same totally ordered primitive), it's clear that XSD 1.0 failed to achieve that. We also concluded that we don't want to try to go there now. The editorial task here, then, is to make it easier to find the list of facets applicable to unions. I'm changing the 'severity' field of this record to reflect the relative simplicity of this task.
Received on Sunday, 9 March 2008 00:04:47 UTC