[Bug 5074] substitution groups not that strictly limited

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5074





------- Comment #5 from xan.gregg@jmp.com  2008-01-03 13:54 -------
Thanks for correcting my schema -- yours is what I intended. Now I see I was
reading things too literally, and that saying a type is a restriction or
extension of another type was just meant as shorthand for the full definition
of valid derivation.

Though the section is introductory, I believe it is normative. The sentence in
question uses "MUST", so I appreciate any tightening you can add.

Received on Thursday, 3 January 2008 13:54:51 UTC