- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 19:58:56 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5168 ------- Comment #4 from cmsmcq@w3.org 2008-01-25 19:58 ------- In comment #3 I claimed that specs with new version numbers are normally issued in numerical order (i.e. new version numbers higher than any existing one), so the presence of gaps in the number ranges doesn't much matter. John Arwe has pointed out that there are counterexamples, or specs which could easily have been counterexamples if they had been numbered 1.05 instead of 1.0 Nth edition. I acknowledge that my argument stinks.
Received on Friday, 25 January 2008 19:59:01 UTC