- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2008 02:40:23 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5431 ------- Comment #2 from davep@iit.edu 2008-01-27 02:40 ------- (In reply to comment #1) > As is revealed by following the hyperlink, the character references it is > referring to are those (such as #) used in XML, not those (such as #x5B) > used in production rules. You got me. :-( I'm embarrassed. See following. > It might be clearer to say something like: "Note: when regular expressions are > written in an XML document, for example in the value attribute of the > xs:pattern element, non-ASCII characters can be represented using XML entity or > character references. For this reason, the regular expression syntax does not > provide any way of representing characters using octal or hexadecimal character > codes. The syntax defined here assumes that XML entity and character references > have already been expanded." Good start. We also will need to comment that people using the mechanism in other situations (such as born-binary derivations in non-XML environments) will have to provide other solutions.
Received on Sunday, 27 January 2008 02:40:31 UTC