- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2008 22:18:40 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5321 ------- Comment #2 from mike@saxonica.com 2008-01-06 22:18 ------- The XML 1.0 Rec does indeed use regex-like constructs in its EBNF notation, described at http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml/#sec-notation. However, I've always felt that it's not very wise to use a regex notation when defining regex syntax, especially when the syntax used in the production rules is different from the regex syntax being described (and is itself defined rather informally). And it's easily avoided.
Received on Sunday, 6 January 2008 22:18:43 UTC