- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 01:49:09 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5276 ------- Comment #6 from cmsmcq@w3.org 2008-02-15 01:49 ------- Reviewing this issue and the alternative formulations given in comment #4, I find myself unable to tell which of the alternatives is better because I cannot tell (a) what we are trying to accomplish, or (b) how the alternatives accomplish it. In general, I think specs are clearer, easier to reason about, and less likely to contain errors if they say what result is to be accomplished and not how to accomplish it. In some cases, saying what is to be accomplished requires a certain amount of terminological infrastructure which can be hard to follow, and just saying what to check can be shorter. Another way to put my question is this: why is the following alternative not among the options being considered? 4.3.2 The number of characters in the actual value of the name attribute of the <element> is 0 modulo 2, if a name attribute is present; if a ref attribute is present, the number of characters in the QName given as its initial value is 1 modulo 0.
Received on Friday, 15 February 2008 01:49:17 UTC