- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 03:59:03 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5396 Summary: What EBNF is used? Product: XML Schema Version: 1.0/1.1 both Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Keywords: editorial Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Datatypes: XSD Part 2 AssignedTo: cmsmcq@w3.org ReportedBy: davep@iit.edu QAContact: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org The spec appears to use the EBNF of the XML spec, but nowhere does it say so. Since that particular EBNF grammar has some relatively uncommon components, such as differences and "#xnn" representations of Unicode characters, we should at least reference it. Or define it ourselves, if what we do is not really identical.
Received on Saturday, 19 January 2008 03:59:10 UTC