- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 04:43:12 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5003 ------- Comment #9 from fsasaki@w3.org 2008-01-15 04:43 ------- (In reply to comment #6) [snip] > > I note that in comment #5 [3] the original commentator states: > > "For our use case, it does not matter if XPath is really applied or if we > achieve the necessary interpretation by infoset augmentation. So I think what > you describe below would respond to our use case." > > So, as I understand it, either approach would be acceptable. this is still the case. Felix > > Noah > > [1] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5003#c1 > [2] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5003#c4 > [3] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5003#c5 >
Received on Tuesday, 15 January 2008 04:43:16 UTC